User talk:Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all other accounts submitted for retiring. Please keep this account only as it was done unintentionally to have a preferred username. Kindly unblock Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) (talk) 3:33 am, 14 February 2021, Sunday (24 days ago) (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

One request at a time _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez), and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez)/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez)/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidilam Firoz (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kidilam Firoz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kidilam Firoz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 12:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez)! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 12:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|1=Blocked stating multiple accounts found. Infact i have already submitted appeal to retire as initial account was not allowing for a username change. currently only one account existing with request to keep the user name Kidilam Firoz. Kindly look into my plea as only one account exists now Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) (talk) 04:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)}.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez)

A tag has been placed on User:Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 12:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=first account was created by mistake as an appeal to retiring the first account was instantly submitted stating the person is famous for his nick name and appealing to delete the first account and keep only the latter account as Kidilam Firoz. Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) (talk) 04:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)}[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Firoz A Azeez, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Kidilam Firoz

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Kidilam Firoz has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kidilam Firoz (Firoz A Azeez) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked stating multiple accounts found. I didnt know how wiki works and since username wanted to appear differently i opened another username. It was unintentional. Now i have surrenderd to retire ohter accounts and one only exist. Kindly look into my plea as only one account exists now

Decline reason:

You appear to have only edited to promote yourself. We are not interested in such contributions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to email

Thanks for email. You have worked out how to make an appeal against the block, you will just have to wait for the request to be considered. I won't deal with it myself, it will be an uninvolved admin. Note that if you work for the same company as him, you must declare that too. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]