User talk:Username20299765

Kittykityee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kittykityee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, Kittykityee, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Trueloveforknowledge (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yumi's Cells have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please read MOS:TVINTL and WP:NOT. Thanks and regards — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Yumi's Cells. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. For the second time, please read MOS:TVINTL and WP:NOT. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yumi's Cells, you may be blocked from editing. Please read what I have told you to previously. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Crazy Love (2022 TV Series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 22:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 04:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) instead.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This is a future television show. Future television shows seldom satisfy television notability, and this is no exception.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad and Crazy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bad and Crazy, is not suitable as written to remain published. See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Future television series are usually not notable. Please resubmit when the series airs. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bad and Crazy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bad and Crazy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Username20299765. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bad and Crazy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bad and Crazy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Username20299765 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Username20299765 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Autoblocked]] because your IP address was recently used by "[[User:Username20299765|Username20299765]]". The reason given for Username20299765's block is: "{{checkuserblock-account}}: Abusing [[WP:SOCK|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Username20299765]]".

Blocking administrator: [[User:‪L235‬|‪L235‬]] ([[User talk:‪L235‬|talk]] • blocks)

Decline reason: You are blocked directly, not autoblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 11:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Username20299765 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here The issue mentioned that I owned several account, which is not true. Under the list of account owned, I do not recognise the account name except User20299765, which is an account owned by a friend of mine. Even the contents edited may be similar, but we are different people editing at different pages. I read through the history on pages I edited, and there is no sign of these accounts supporting my position as well? My sole purpose on wikipedia is to include the available streaming sites for k-dramas and anime

Decline reason:

I'm not sure if that was what you were trying to say, but your request really reads like you're admitting to violating the one user, one account rule. It doesn't matter how you use such an account if you're sharing it with others for no reason we'd let you, or without letting us know. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.