User talk:Lady-Phoenix

Welcome!

Hello, Lady-Phoenix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Wireless ad hoc network. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~Kvng (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NetSim (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add additional independent reliable sources. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or asking at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NetSim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NetSim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lady-Phoenix! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NetSim (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No significant improvements since the last time this was declined. The entire History section should be deleted per WP:NSOFT#Style guide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NetSim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NetSim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial article changes

Hello Lady-Phoenix, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia articles. But please make sure to provide a meaningful edit summary when you delete or change substantial content (especially when the content is sourced). Also, please provide an independent reliable source whenever you add substantial new content to an article. If you have any further questions about Wikipedia editing, please feel free to ask me on my user talkpage or at the general WP:Help desk. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

Hi, please do not just remove dead references. Better tag them with {{dead link}} like here, and only if that tag remains there for a while (a year), remove the reference altogether. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Packerfan386. I noticed that you recently removed content from 5G without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask at the Teahouse. Thanks. Packerfan386beer here 08:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]