User talk:Laxfan96

Welcome!

Hello, Laxfan96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page St. Bonaventure University have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! PamD 14:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Walsh

There is no evidence that Brian Walsh is a notable alumnus of St. Bonaventure University. Please stop adding him to the list with a link to the disambiguation page where he is not listed. PamD 14:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Hell in a Bucket. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at St. Bonaventure University, you may be blocked from editing. JSpung (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Key (lock), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Key (lock) was changed by Laxfan96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969688 on 2015-02-12T16:13:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Key (lock). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. PamD 17:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laxfan96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The first two edits were just joke but the stats on Coyle's page were the updated stats for this season which weren't vandalism. Laxfan96 (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure how you count to two, but this edit was still nonsense. That's not a good signal-to-noise ratio. Huon (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you have a connection to User:Hockeymin101, who reinserted your deleted content as their first edit? I have opened an investigation into this here, but your response here (since you can't post there) will be noted. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Laxfan96. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]