User talk:Leif Eriksson VV

Empty edit request

Hello. An edit request you recently made was empty and has been removed. Please see planning an edit request for more information on how to prepare a proper request. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, — LauritzT (talk) 10:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

I have reverted a few of your edits, such as Shershaah, for overlinking - so I have come to explain the reason.
As explained at ‎ WP:OVERLINKING we only link the first use of a term in an article, and we do not normally link:-

Everyday words understood by most readers.
Names familiar to most readers, including;- major countries, major cities, major languages, major nationalities/ethnicities and major religions
Common units of measurement and dates

There are many articles where these are already, incorrectly, linked; however, India is clearly a major country, so should not be linked - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaadan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The plot is too small, it should updated And the film was aired on Zee Tamil and digital rights of this film acquired by Zee5. I was just adding the correct things and you reverted those. Ok I'm not editing it Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 12:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LightPirate. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tiger Shroff have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. LightPirate (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leif Eriksson VV, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Leif Eriksson VV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Murder (film series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on Dhoom (franchise). Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a violation of the terms of our license. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't copied anything on Dhoom (franchise) Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Krrish (franchise). — Diannaa (talk) 14:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't copied anything from IMDb. Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Krrish into Krrish (franchise). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verbal abuse in hindi language

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 06:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I said because he was editing wrong things. Deleting other users edits. If you look his edit history you will find the same, he is putting unsourced statements in every pages, no reliable sources. This is Wikipedia every user has to follow the rules and regulations. I invited him to Teahouse, but he doesn't Shows up. So I warned him many times, but he didn't listen. So I behaved like that. I'm a human, not robot. If I see any mistakes I will correct it. And one thing for you Kalu dada, why you requested to block me ?? You know the rules, you should have left a message on my talk page like other users. But you directly gone for a block request. Hmmm. Good. Ok thank you. Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 07:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIR

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sooryavanshi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 08:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you for everything. Now it's my turn your IP and A/C be banned forever. Leif Eriksson VV (talk) 08:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Edits m

Please dont do wrong Edits in Aranmanai wikipedia page. 2409:4072:71B:560C:4003:F10F:151D:C67C (talk) 10:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated personal attacks, disruptive editing and copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now extended this block so as to revoke your ability to edit your talk page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FDMD04. Thank you. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fun and Frustration for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fun and Frustration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun and Frustration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 07:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pizza (film series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pizza (film series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizza (film series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 03:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]