User talk:Lilithceusan

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Lilithceusan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nella the Princess Knight did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nella the Princess Knight, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 10:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hammersoft (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rusty Rivets, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Butterbean's Café. Magitroopa (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hammersoft (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If, on return from this latest block, you continue this behavior the block will be for considerably longer. You have an opportunity to discuss changes you would like to make, rather than edit war in an attempt to force your way. I strongly advise you to take advantage of it. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rusty Rivets, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 08:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced content. The prior two blocks apparently had no effect on your editing, as after this last block expired you returned to making the exact same sort of edits as what got you blocked before. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. However, if you continue again as you have before, the next block is likely to be indefinite.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rusty Rivets, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

When making edits, please include an edit summary. If you don't, users may misunderstand you. 172.250.44.165 (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]