User talk:Lipipuspa

Welcome!

Hello, Lipipuspa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Madhurya Bhakti, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madhurya Bhakti

The article Madhurya Bhakti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not make it clear what this is promoting

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhurya Bhakti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devotees. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

I have redirected your Madhurya Bhakti page to Bhakti#Bhavas. The article you wrote was unsourced and highly biased, and largely covered material already available at the existing article. Please do not create content forks: Wikipedia should have only one article on a given topic. If you have well-sourced material to add to the existing article, please do so. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lipipuspa, I tried to explain the problem above, but perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Your version of the Madhurya Bhakti page was written very much from the point of view of a practitioner of this form of devotion. It was something of a prayer guide, a "how to practice Madhurya Bhakti, the 'most exalted form of devotion'". But Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. We don't write prayer guides or personal reflections on worship. We're creating an encyclopedia here for the entire world to read, not just an article for devotees or would-be devotees of this particular form of worship. And since the Bhakti article already discusses the philosophy underlying the devotion in much clearer, and more neutral terms, it is unnecessary and undesirable to split that content into a new article. I know you spent a great deal of time on this article, and perhaps you can find another outlet for your writing. But it is not correct for Wikipedia and what we are trying to accomplish here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61: This is not a prayer. This is a philosophy of divine love and how to attain the ultimate bliss. Since I found there is no page which describes it better, so I created this page. If in the Bhakti#Bhavas , the writer had described it accurately then I wouldn't have described it in my Madhurya Bhakti page.

@WikiDan61: If it is not the right place, then I would like to know for what purpose wikipedia is created. For the right information or for the wrong information ?

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:WikiDan61, you may be blocked from editing. Aurora (talk • contribs) 12:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Madhurya Bhakti. DVdm (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is needed

Your edits at Madhurya Bhakti have been undone by three separate editors, and yet you insist on having your version. I have opened a discussion at Talk:Madhurya Bhakti which I invited you to join, but you have not. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and works on the basis of consensus. You have refused to enter into the discussion to build the required consensus. I have once again restored the article as a redirect to Bhakti. Please enter the discussion before restoring your content to the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Krakatoa Katie 08:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]