User talk:LockstepDoc

December 2015

I have reverted two of your edits, because they do not fit under Notable Alumni, and are also unsourced

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishabh Arora

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Rishabh Arora, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishabh Arora

Hello LockstepDoc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rishabh Arora for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LockstepDoc/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 03:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! LockstepDoc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 03:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2MASSJ22282889-431026 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2MASSJ22282889-431026. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2MASSJ22282889-431026 has been accepted

2MASSJ22282889-431026, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)