User talk:Lorcan0t

August 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sunderland, Tyne and Wear has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sunderland, Tyne and Wear was changed by Lorcan0t (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878943 on 2014-08-31T16:38:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Northumberland within Britain.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Northumberland within Britain.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northumberland[edit]

As you may or may not be aware, the decision was made here some years ago to refer to the traditional counties as such - or as historic counties, etc. - rather than suggesting that they still exist for administrative purposes. I would have no problem with edits that add explanatory material referring to the traditional counties. But what you seem to be trying to do is to remove reference to the current administrative counties. That is unacceptable, varies from the established consensus (which of course you can try to change, through discussion with others), and will continue to be reverted, by me or others. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Northumberland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Northumberland within Britain.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Northumberland within Britain.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Final warning. Your edits to England ‎, Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne and Northumberland have been reverted by multiple editors. You have previously been warned by Ghmyrtle about Edit warring on Historic county issues. If you continue to do so your editing access, will be blocked. Richard Harvey (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am disappointed you ignored this warning. Edit-warring damages collaboration and makes our articles unstable. Do not do it. I have blocked your account for 24 hours for edit warring. If you wish to appeal you may post {{unblock|your reason here ~~~~}} but if you plan to do so you should read WP:GAB first. On your return, please agree changes in talk first rater than edit-warring. --John (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rod Clements may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Rod Clements''' (born '''Roderick Parry Clements''', 17 November 1947, [[North Shields]], is a British guitarist,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]