User talk:LordGabenOfWikipedia

This is LordGabenOfWikipedia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This may be a test edit that was submitted by mistake. With proper attribution to Samuel Johnson, this could be added to the article Oats.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LordGabenOfWikipedia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LordGabenOfWikipedia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

No change since last submission. The previous reviewer's advice is indeed good advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LordGabenOfWikipedia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 20:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:LordGabenOfWikipedia/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:LordGabenOfWikipedia/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at A Dictionary of the English Language. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment they left was:

These definitions can be added to the list of interesting definitions in the article on Johnson's Dictionary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LordGabenOfWikipedia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuck Norris Republic of Chuckyland

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chuck Norris Republic of Chuckyland, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GAB^Hello! 22:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —SMALL JIM 22:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scots Wikipedia

Hello,

I see you are making contributions in the Scots dialect. Maybe you could try the Scots Wikipedia instead?

Thanks, Ajraddatz (Talk) 09:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oaties

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Oaties, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Oat. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Oat, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up the day, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 09:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah awso point oot that in maist dialects of the Scots leid, Oat is generally "Ait". "Oaties" isnae guid Scots.--Shirt58 (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]