User talk:Luccass

Welcome!

Hello, Luccass, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Luka Karadžić, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jenks24 (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luka Karadžić

The article Luka Karadžić has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jenks24 (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Luka Karadžić. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 13:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Luka Karadžić. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luka Karadžić

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Luka Karadžić, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenks24 (talk) 13:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luka Karadžić

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Luka Karadžić, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenks24 (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Luka Karadžić, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Datum

Prilikom svakog ažuriranja statistika potrebno je promeniti datum. U suprotnom svaka izmena može biti vraćena kao nerelevantna. Isto tako, bilo koje brisanje teksta bez navođenja razloga odnosno izvora može biti poništeno. Mali i nadam se, konstruktivan savet. Pozdrav!Lotom (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Luccass. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updating football articles

Please do not add 'live updates' (I.e. whilst the game is still in progress) as you did at Luka Milivojević. Please also note that all parameters must be updated, particularly the club update field as well as the statistics table in the body of the article. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia national football team

Dear Luccass, please read Wikipedia:BRD. You were bold, you were reverted, now don´t edit war and discuss to obtein consensus for your edit. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 16:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zato sto je to sve jedna te ista reprezentacija koja je menjala ime u toku istorije. Necemo da odustajemo od toga, to je politicka odluka koja je priznata od strane FIFA i UEFA. FkpCascais (talk) 16:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja apolutno razumem tvoj edit, ali takvi potezi bi bili pola puta drugima da nam oduzmu priznanje da smo mi jedna te ista federacija (FSJ/FSCG/FSS) i jedna te ista reprezentacija. Jeste, drugi su igrali za nas, takva je situacija bila, posle su se odcepili. Ali, reprezentacija Kraljevine SHS, Kraljevine Jugoslavije, SFR Jugoslavije, FR Jugoslavije, Srbije i Crne Gore, i Srbije, to je sve jedna te ista reperzentaciija i statistika treba da joj se vodi celokupno. To potvrdjuju i sajtovi poput EU-football.info, FIFA, UEFA, reprezentacija.rs, itd. Treba uvek da imamo celokupnu statistiku, a ova sto si dodao moze da bude dodatna, kao kuriozitet, nikako zamena. FkpCascais (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Daj onda da se napravi jos jedan prozor igraci koji su igrali samo za Srbiju i koji su davali golove samo za Srbiju Luccass (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mogli bi mozda napraviti stranu Serbia national football team records and statistics gde mi mogli sve te razne liste da pravimo. FkpCascais (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Luccass. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filip Jović moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Filip Jović, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filip Jović

Hello, Luccass. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filip Jović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 16:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]