Jump to content

User talk:Luciareis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Luciareis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

[edit]

Hi Luciareis welcome to English Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. If any of the articles you create are translations of articles from Portuguese Wikipedia it is our policy that you must attribute same by placing, for instance, {{translated page|pt|Outro Olhar}} or {{translated page|pt|Danielle, Asperger}} on the talk page of the new article or at the very least say something like "created by translating page from Portuguese Wikipedia" in an edit summary when creating the article. I hope you have a great time here and happy editing. Josey Wales Parley 12:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Selma Sueli Silva moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Selma Sueli Silva, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 14:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sophia Mendonça has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Sophia Mendonça has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

Hi there. I've noticed that many of your edits concern Sophia Mendonça. Do you have any connection with Sophia Mendonça outside of Wikipedia? Best, Spicy (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luciareis, you did not respond to this, and I see that you have not used a talk page before. You will have to start communicating since there are concerns with your contributions. Jay 💬 21:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon reviews

[edit]

Hi my friend. I hope you are fine. WP:RSPAMAZON says: "Amazon is a reliable source for basic information about a work (such as release date, ISBN, etc.)", but adds: "User reviews on Amazon are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all." Hope this helps. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entre Fadas e Bruxos

[edit]

Hi my friend, this page seems to be shaping up pretty well, but it would really help if you could addres the issue of notability. Do you know of any third-party reviews of the book, or any wider media coverage, that might help you to demonstrate notability. HERE you will find Wikipedia's guidance on what type of evidence will be necessary. Very best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isabela Boscov moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Isabela Boscov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ikeda: Um Século de Humanismo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Transtorno do Espectro Autista e Acessibilidade Amorosa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Amores (a)Típicos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any in-depth coverage of this podcast from independent, reliable, secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 10:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mundo Autista

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sophia Silva de Mendonça, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Silva de Mendonça moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sophia Silva de Mendonça, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sophia Mendonça

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sophia Mendonça, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sophia Mendonça, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 15:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sophia Mendonça for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Mendonça is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Mendonça until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minha vida de trás pra frente for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minha vida de trás pra frente is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minha vida de trás pra frente until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raquel Romano for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raquel Romano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raquel Romano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isabela Boscov

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Luciareis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isabela Boscov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]