User talk:LuisDOrtega

LuisDOrtega, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi LuisDOrtega! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Wow man you really hate this guy... I wish you lived in NY and got to meet him. I wish I lived there too but I think if you met him personally your hate would go away. 108.41.20.161 (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Luis D. Ortiz, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃   02:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The article is already referenced. The added detail is merely added detail already in the cited article. Thank you.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luis D. Ortiz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• going to work or not?” He didn't speak to his mother for the first six or seven months in the U.S.] and his mother "wanted to kill" him and his brother.<ref name="realdeal">http://therealdeal.com/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Luis D. Ortiz. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luis D. Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Luis D. Ortiz. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Huon, you want to delete information in a Controversy section because you are saying it is controversial? Do you see how ridiculous that is?LuisDOrtega (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I want to delete that information because no source calls it controversial. Manufacuring controversies is a violation of WP:BLP. Huon (talk) 02:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)