User talk:LukeScholar95

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 12:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LukeScholar95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LukeScholar95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Gympie Pyramid

Hi - I've reverted you. You removed sourced text from the first paragraph (sourced elsewhere) and added material suggesting that aborigines were descended from Black Chinese, which isn't the case. Doug Weller talk 12:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a speculation, the original idea was far more ridiculous but was also none the less a speculation. White people want to claim everything. White settlers of more recent Australian history built the Gympie Pyramids? Don't make me laugh. As I mentioned there were Chinese Negrito that migrated to South America, called the Xhi (Olmec). If you disagree look at some of the phenotypes on those people you see fewer Mongoloid phenotypes but rather Negroid phenotypes. So when you're linking the South America to the Australian pyramids you have to be a bit realistic. The first ever Australians were clearly black, then somehow came across Neanderthal and that's why they have a different look to them than your average black person. Connect the dots and it works in my favour. Mongoloid Chinese entered China in the 12 hundreds AD. So they can't be genetically similar to the Chinese people that migrated to South America, that goes against all logic. Pure fantasy, there is not one piece of land where black people have not set foot on because we were the first humans and unlike we are told to believe black people were not primitive. How are there Negrito all over Asia but when it comes to China we're left in the dark even though there is plenty of evidence that suggests blacks were there?

You're editing a mainstream encyclopedia. There are no mainstream archaeologists that would accept your ideas. Doug Weller talk 18:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:FROM-DISTINGUISHED-NEGROES-ABROAD-BY-JACKSON-AND-PRYDE-SAKANOUYE-TAMURARO-OF-JAPAN-LEADING-TROOPS-INTO-BATTLE-600x450.jpg

There is a discussion at c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright#File:FROM-DISTINGUISHED-NEGROES-ABROAD-BY-JACKSON-AND-PRYDE-SAKANOUYE-TAMURARO-OF-JAPAN-LEADING-TROOPS-INTO-BATTLE-600x450.jpg concerning the origin and copyright status of two images that you have uploaded to Commons. Can you confirm that these are from the book indicated in the filename? Does this book say that this is an "ancient painting", because to me it looks more like a 20th century picture, albeit one this is probably now public domain. Thanks, Verbcatcher (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]