Jump to content

User talk:Luke warmwater

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Barber (April 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Luke warmwater! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Barber (April 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on help chat

[edit]

Luke, I can see that the article was declined twice because the sources are insufficient to demonstrate this subject's notability. The standards we apply are WP:N and WP:BIO. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --Salimfadhley (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Barber (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Alex Zane, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Barber has been accepted

[edit]
Emily Barber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul W (talk) 12:29, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]