User talk:Lukejekyll

Welcome!

Hello, Lukejekyll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DarjeelingTea (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lukejekyll. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Jekyll

Hello Lukejekyll,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Jekyll for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nick Jekyll

Hello, Lukejekyll,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nick Jekyll should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Jekyll .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paradise London

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Lukejekyll, thanks for creating Paradise London!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references to sources that provide substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources. Please avoid press releases, the subject's own website and event announcements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Paradise London. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mduvekot (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paradise London Live

Hello Lukejekyll,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paradise London Live for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paradise London

The article Paradise London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paradise London for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paradise London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise London until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mduvekot (talk) 12:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 15:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved your article to Draft:Fades

Hullo. The page you were editing, originally a redirect to another band, did not seem quite ready for publishing. I have moved it to Draft:Fades where you can work on it before it becomes live. If you need help editing or returning it to the encyclopedia when it's done, please reach out. Ifnord (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luke Jekyll

The article Luke Jekyll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are vaguely promotional and consist largely of interviews, making them WP:PRIMARY sources; not sufficient to pass WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive conflict of interest

Hi Lukejekyll, I hope you're reading these messages. Please do take the time to reply, as Wikipedia is a collaborative project and others may be concerned about you ignoring their concerns.

Specifically, you appear to have a strong conflict of interest regarding all or most of the topics you're editing about. If the conflict of interest guideline, others' repeated complaints and the repeated deletion of pages you create doesn't get the point across, you may need to be blocked from creating further articles, or even editing Wikipedia at all. This has already been requested at WP:AIV, but people are currently being unusually kind towards you.

Do you agree to stop editing and creating articles about topics you have such a close connection to? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]