User talk:Lupinwork

Lupinwork, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Lupinwork!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black privilege

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Black privilege, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, you may not copy the White privilege article and just change all references of white to black. —C.Fred (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Black Privilege, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right after this was posted, you created Jimcolo and created the same draft again. I have blocked that account. Please do not recreate that inappropriate page or make any more new accounts. From now on, please only make constructive edits. Thank you kindly in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from White privilege with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White privilege with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black privilege

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Black privilege, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Black privilege. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I've blocked this account indefinitely for creating a hoax article, Black privilege, by copying from White privilege and changing certain words, including the titles of source articles. Lupinwork, I'll post a block template below so that you can use it to request an unblock if you want to. Sarah ^(talk) 20:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.