User talk:Lzxy

April 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Erich Bauer has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Burmese–Siamese War (1765–1767) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joyous! Noise! 02:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lzxy! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Erich Bauer several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Erich Bauer, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oatmeal raisin cookie. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oatmeal raisin cookie was changed by Lzxy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96543 on 2024-04-11T03:07:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Joyous! Noise! 03:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why was i blocked? Lzxy (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lzxy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not doing any vandalism at all, and all my edits were being instantly reverted

Decline reason:

Since you think that your edits were appropriate, there are no grounds to remove the block. You're going to need to be able to tell us what was wrong with your edits and what you will do differently. I'll give you one for free- your edit to the oatmeal cookie article was completely wrong in tone and was completely unsourced. 331dot (talk) 07:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.