User talk:MagnusPalmblad

Hello, MagnusPalmblad and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nomination for deletion of Template:Recipients of the John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry

Template:Recipients of the John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Hi,

I think that the recently creasted (2018) Template:Recipients of the John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry is redundant with the previously existing Template:Recipients of the Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry Award. I suggest to delete the new template, and to rename (move) the old template. Kind regards. Ileresolu (talk) 08:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this! Please go ahead and delete the new template and rename the old template. MagnusPalmblad (talk) 10:28, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Recipients of the John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry

A tag has been placed on Template:Recipients of the John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 10:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Svante Arrhenius Medal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Svante Arrhenius Medal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Josh,

Thank you for your feedback. What kind of sources would best establish notability? The medal is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (https://www.kva.se/priser/medaljer/ - unfortunately not available in English). While not as notable as some of their other prizes (e.g. the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry), it is certainly known in the field of chemistry, where I am active. The most recent recipient (this year) was Per Siegbahn (https://www.kva.se/nyheter/pressinbjudan-vetenskapsakademien-delar-ut-arets-priser/). My initial motivation for creating this and the related page on the Arrhenius Plaque was actually that these two awards are sometimes confused, so I thought it would be good to have a short Wikipedia entry for each.

The Svante Arrhenius Medal is mentioned on the Swedish-language page for the academy, but not (yet) on the English page. I suppose this and several other of their medals and prizes are better known in Sweden than abroad, since they are primarily awarded to Swedish scientists, or scientists active in Sweden (unlike the Nobel Prize).

Most newspaper articles would be about individual recipients, and most of these would be in Swedish, which I realize may not help much with proving international notability.

MagnusPalmblad (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside - the funds for the medal comes from the Foundation for Svante Arrhenius Memorial Medal Fund (Swedish: Stiftelsen Svante Arrhenius minnesmedaljfond). There is no monetary prize, but I suppose there are some costs associated with producing the physical medal in gold. MagnusPalmblad (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arrhenius Plaque moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arrhenius Plaque. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Svante Arrhenius Medal (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The KVA cannot make its own award notable, per WP:GNG we need to see significant coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Svante Arrhenius Medal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MagnusPalmblad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrhenius Plaque has been accepted

Arrhenius Plaque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pygos (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]