User talk:MarkSutton

Welcome!

Hello, MarkSutton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 11:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

You're doing a good job keeping vandalism down. Keep it up and you might be in store for barnstars. Averross (u♠t♠c)

Most obliged for removing the slur (by Space 7) from my name. Thanks --Cunningham 17:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For tirelessly reverting vandals, I award you this barnstar! Keep up the good work! ShakingSpirit ^talk 11:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHICOTW[edit]

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you helped edit the Chicago COTW, but did not vote. Thank you for your help! Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. This week Union Stock Yards has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking[edit]

Many thanks for unblocking me. I thought that blocking was a privilege only vailable to administrators: any idea as to how Space7 was able to apply a block? Or was it just the appearance of a block (which, having now reviewed block log, I assume to be the case)? Thanks either way. Kevin McE 22:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking me as well. ChrisCork 13:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you beated me to him[edit]

lol nice jobArnon Chaffin 21:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Theatre GA[edit]

	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Chicago Tonight is the current Chicago COTW You were a contributing editor to Chicago Theatre during its tenure as CHICOTW. It has successfully achieved Good article status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the featured article classification level. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following Improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History. Note our good articles.
Contributing editors:AKeen, ChicagoPimp, SmackBot, Speciate, TheQuandry, TonyTheTiger, Whyaduck, (Darwinek, ERcheck, Lonnyw, MarkSutton, VirtualSteve).
	Good Article

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage[edit]

Hi, thanks for your quick work reverting my userpage. Cheers. ElinorD (talk) 19:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

I saw the tags you added to the Kingsland Explosion article. It took me a moment to understand them, but I got it now. I will be adding more links in the coming days. I added one to World War I and I hope I did it right. Thanks for educating me! --Witchzilla 17:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile[edit]

James, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Little Boy Drumming On Pots[edit]

Didn't you speedily delete Talk:The Little Boy Drumming On Pots? It's back. HokieRNB 12:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks![edit]

... for taking the time to revert vandalism to the Adrian Lamo article :)

—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2007-06-10 04:35Z

lone fox last of the foxes[edit]

thanks !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lone Fox the last of the foxes (talk • contribs) 14:53, June 10, 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Forgottenhope[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Forgottenhope, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Forgottenhope is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Forgottenhope, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh_The_Great9[edit]

Question: Would it be wrong if I posted an article I wrote about Garcia(it's against him, of course)

But doesn't that completely undermine the idea of an opinion column, I mean that would mean no one could express themselves on Wikipedia outside of userboxes.

Are you part cheetah?[edit]

Whoa, you're fast. You bet me here by like a second. Twinkly has never failed me like this before :-) Happy editing, and keep up the good work! --Ag ü eybaná 21:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) --Ag ü eybaná 21:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bartleby.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bartleby.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Essex discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals[edit]

Description: A project for the county of Essex, England

Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)

Chris 05:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Maybe you could try Category:Wikipedians from Essex and also place notices e.g. at Wikipedia:WikiProject England. Simply south (talk) 19:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The best kind of userpage vandalism...[edit]

Is the kind you don't find out about until you check your userpage's edit history, so thank you for this revert! -- saberwyn 06:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for this revert. Wonder how on earth I got hit, Ahhh. I see. An AfD where the creator (and apparently, his army) don't like me. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 03:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]