Jump to content

User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive 38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40→Archive 45

Request on 21:37:52, 3 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Razavianshirin


Dear Matthew, Thank you for your message.My name is Shirin Razavian (www.shirinrazavian.com). I have a message from Wikipedia that my article was reviewed and rejected by you. I have been writing poetry for over 30 years. I am well known as an exiled Iranian poet. I have 5 books of poetry published in London as you can see form the below link: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Books-Shirin-Razavian/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A266239%2Cp_27%3AShirin%20Razavian I have worked with several human rights organisations including Amnesty International:eg. http://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/amnesty-evening-writing-and-rhyming-keats-house-hampstead-thursday-22nd-november-7pm I am a member of Exiled Writers Ink! (http://www.exiledwriters.co.uk/writers.shtml#Razavian). My work has been translated by Robert Chandler (http://www.shirinrazavian.com/english/english_events.html) I have also been in the Iranian PEN in Exile in the management committee for 4 years as International Secretary and in the Iranian Writers in Exile for 2 years. (http://www.englishpen.org/event/at-liberty-to-say/)

I would be grateful if you can reconsider your decision.

Happy New Year! Best regards Shirin Razavian Razavianshirin (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Razavianshirin (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Salom [[Shirin, articles are not at all related to literary merit, nor to number of publications. Articles are accepted or declined based on the presentation of WP:Third party sources that discuss the subject. Your number of published works, linkages with other groups, etc. are not what decide a topic being encyclopedic. We don't care what an author writes, we care about what people write about that author. I strongly urge you to read WP:Notability (writers) to see what components are mandatory for author articles.
Separately, you should not be writing your own article. Please see WP:Autobiography which explains why this is a very bad idea. If you're significant enough to merit an article, somewhere in the world some fan of yours will write one about you. If there is nobody on the planet more interested in writing about you, other than your own self, then why would we need an article? MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Salam Matthew,

You are obviously choosing to overlook hundreds of organisations and media who have interviewed and published me. If having poetry published in highly regarded literary magazines like Poetry London, The London Magazine, Index on Censorship, Article 19, Exiled Writers Magazine and many others is not considered merit, then I fail to see what is. If there was nobody on the planet who respected my work, then all of these publications and media would not reflect any of it. I have been interviewed and read poetry in many different media including the BBC, Voice of America, House of parliament fund raising events among many others. I can go on and I don't frankly see the need to do so. There is no need for you to be so rude to some unsuspecting Wikipedia user who only wanted to contribute to a great source of information. I am highly disappointed in your attitude in the way you have replied to me. I asked for guidance as a user and in your position instead of offering help, you have chosen to launch a personal attack on me which is totally unnecessary and unprofessional. I am asking you again to explain how we can prove merit if not through all of the above. If you feel you are unable or unwilling to offer any help then please refer me to someone who can. Also, if you are as fluent in Farsi as you seem to claim then please read the tens of literary critiques on my work on the following link: http://www.shirinrazavian.com/farsi/farsi_events.html

Thank you. Razavianshirin (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Razavianshirin (talk) 14:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Shirin, nobody is launching a personal attack at you. It is inappropriate to write one's own encyclopedia article, and I am pointing out the inherent paradox of someone both claiming to merit an article, but also having nobody more inclined to write the article than themself. Would you not concur that a mark of fame should be that someone else is inclined to write about you? If you are famous, have faith in your fame, and wait for the world to produce an article.
Next, I am not "choosing to overlook" anything. As a reviewer, I review what is in the article itself. If you have been extensively covered in media, who have discussed your life, career, etc and you have not opted to supply any of that information, it is not incumbent on me to go searching out that information for you. Again, as noted from the very beginning, marked on the Decline notice at the top of your draft, I suggested you read the guideline WP:Notability (poets) which makes very clear what the sourcing requirements are.
I'm sorry you feel personally slighted, but the fact remains a) it is a very, very bad idea to write your own article and Wikipedia strongly advises you do not do so b) your draft did not provide any of the needed components listed as requirements at WP:Notability (poets), so the draft was declined for that reason.
If you feel that my stance as a reviewer is somehow incorrect, you are welcome to post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, but I can guarantee you that even a body of other involved reviewers will tell you exactly what I have told you here. I suggest that if you want to write articles, that you write them about topics not directly related to yourself, in order to maintain the objectivity required of an encyclopedia. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Citing help

Hello,

I'm a 14 year old boy that makes movies with my cousins. We call ourselves the Kuzkids. We've made 4ish movies and we want to start to get out there more to advertise. I have tried to get everything, IMDb page, Wiki page, and I managed to get a verified business. I can't get anyone to do an article on us, so I can use it as a source. I made one website, but you people won't acknowledge it because it may not have truthful info. I tried using Themoviedb.com, but they said it was on the blacklist. What should I do? I just want to get it on Wikipedia. What source could I use?, we've never had anything written about us by another person other than me.

Thanks, Kuzkid

Kuzkids (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Kuzkids, if you've never had anything written about us by another person other than me, then there's your answer. Your group does not meet our corps requirement WP:Notability, which by definition means that a lot of other people write about, analyze, critique your group in professional information sources like newspapers, entertainment journals, academic papers, etc. Maybe your group will get famous and get lots of coverage next year, but until that happens, if other people don't write about them, they can't have an article.
Next, see WP:Autobiography; it is a very bad idea to write about yourself, since our articles must be neutral and one really can't be neutral while writing about oneself. Wikipedia is not a place where we allow advertising, promoting, etc. so my suggestion is that you stick to making movies, and leave it to other people in the future to write about your work. If you do want to contribute to Wikipedia and learn about how it works, and more about film, why not help write articles about other films, directors, etc? That way you can still help inform the world, and learn more about your craft. If you're interested in that, I suggest you go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, introduce yourself to other film article writers there, and ask where would be a good place to get started expanding Wikipedia's coverage of films. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:MastaLukeDJHero/sandbox

Hello MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:MastaLukeDJHero/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Instrumentalism

Hello, Matthew. I understand and accept your rejection of my recent sandbox submission. But let me explain my situation and ask your advice.

When I first found problems with “Instrumentalism,” I hoped I could make a series of small amendments and elicit feedback. But I came to conclude that major revision was required and, after 3 months of trying to arouse interest in my suggestions on talk pages of half a dozen related articles, I got essentially no response. So I started composing a major revision.

Then I realized that sandbox had a place to submit proposals, which I did, thinking I would get corrections of markup or maybe even comments on substance. That’s when I got your rejection.

So what is your advice? I still want to offer a complete replacement of the existing article. I thought I might do it in three or four stages, deleting sections of the present article and replacing them with my new sections—always fearing I would make some mark-up error that would explode the whole effort.

I will appreciate any and all suggestions. Thanks.TBR-qed (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello TBR-qed, I see the issue now. Broadly speaking, the "Articles for Creation" process is requesting that a whole article be approved and published, and by definition we don't publish an article to replace another article. If you have posted on the Talk page for that article, indicating your intentions, and have gotten no response, I suggest you WP:Be bold and just start swapping in portions of your Sandbox version into the main existing article.
I suggest you do this in small bite-size pieces rather than en-masse, and that you use the WP:Edit summary little box below your editing window to briefly explain what/why you are changing. That way other people can clearly see the course you're taking and why. I would also urge you to make sure that material you add is properly WP:Sourced, ideally with footnotes, and that you attempt not to remove footnoted content from the current article unless you can state that it is blatantly incorrect/misleading, or that you are adding material that covers the same point but is better written/sourced. If someone objects to your changes and reverts them, then you can start a conversation with that person as to what they do and don't agree with, and collaborate to improve the article. And if nobody reverts your changes, I suppose it's win-win then. Hope this helps. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Matthew. I'll follow your suggestions, be bold, and see what happens.63.228.87.237 (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Hill article

Matthew,

There is no reason to keep the Keith Richard Hill version of this entry. There were too many errors and private information and no references. I took the best parts and corrected the information, removed the private information and tried to put in references. Obviously I did it wrong so I need to correct that, which I presently will do. I have been a musical instrument maker for more than 43 years. Classing my work as a Luthier is inaccurate. Most of my instrument making has been harpsichords, fortepianos, and clavichords. Keyboard instrument makers are not usually called luthiers, they are called by the instrument they make. My work is unusual in that I make all three types of keyboard instruments as well as building violins, violas da gamba, etc. That I why I call myself, as I have done since 1972, an Instrument Maker. So the correct title for the entry should be: Keith Hill - Instrument Maker, not Keith Hill (Luthier).

Thanks,

K HillKeith R Hill (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Matthew,

The References ended up at the bottom of the page under the heading external linksKeith R Hill (talk) 09:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 01:36:24, 6 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by VEER™


Hello, I would just like to let you know, that the people at the AKJ article have been taking down my article, and not giving me any reason why, they don't tell what is wrong with my article, at least they can tell me so I can fix it. This why I submit the article here because I wanted to get approval from the staff.VEER™ (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

VEER™ (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello VEER™, regardless of conflicts at an existing article, AFC does not approve replacement articles for an article which already exists. You must address disputes over existing articles through Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
First off, you say they give no explanation. Have you read the Talk page to see if they have raised the issues, and read the summaries (with explanations given) in the History tab of the article?
Just from my outsider view, your version seems very non-neutral, so I very much see why others may object. Yours reads very much like it as written by an adamant supporter of the group, whereas the current version, though very flawed, reads somewhat more neutrally.
I would strongly advise you to post on the Talk page of the article, though it appears you have already alienated a lot of editors by steadfastly pasting back in text after it is removed, rather than discussing the issue, and possibly may be accused of having dodged account blocks to persist in such behavior. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 04:49:24, 6 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Steveswell


It appears that the title of my article draft "Ultimate Restorations" has been misspelled in the message of non-acceptance I received from Matthew Vanitas. I see no way to correct this in the "edit" section of the draft page. Is there a way for me to correct the spelling of the title of my article? Is this even necessary? I don't see any place on the edit page to change the title, but it shows up as "Editing Draft:Ultimated Restorations" instead of the title I chose "Ultimate Restorations" Please advise.

Thank you, Steveswell


Steveswell (talk) 04:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 11:13:23, 6 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Orly Art


Regarding my draft article 'Orly Aviv', I have questions. I'll check the language but regarding the notability I need some leads. If an artist has won prizes from international competitions, has exhibited worldwide she can't be considered as notable ? If another wikipedia page mentioned her is it not a hint that she is notable ? If that particular page is not in English but my draft article is, should I change the page into English ?


Orly Art (talk) 11:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Center for Professional Innovation and Education

Surprised to see that this article was declined as other organizations/companies which are much smaller in size and market impact are included on Wikipedia. Gfellows555 (talk) 16:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Gfellows555, it is not at all an issue of size or market impact. As indicated by the pink box at the top of your draft, you should read Wikipedia:Notability (companies) which will answer 95% of your questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

queensland university squadron (QUS) draft

Hi Matt, I am having trouble navigating to find your comments on the draft. can u please redirect them back to me. Re notability. The QUS is a sister organisation to the Queensland University Regiment which is listed in Wikipedia. One Airforce the other army. Draft Content is from the last Chief Instructor & I am a past instructor.QUSRAAFCAF (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Are you referring to Draft:Queensland University Squadron? It was declined because you submitted it with nothing on the page but sub-page for queensland university squadron for editing main article before transfer. So there's nothing for me to review, so it was Declined. Please do not click Resubmit until you have a draft on the page that you think is generally ready for potential publication.
I'll point out just to be safe, if you write about an organization it is not at all sufficient to just post a link to their website and call it day. We do not publish any article about an organization unless the submitter includes clear sourcing to neutral third party experts. So, if a major regional newspaper, or a book of Queensland history, mention the QUS and discuss its impact, etc. then that you can cite. But one cannot simply paste a mission statement and a link and expect it to publish as an article. Articles require objective sourcing. I strongly advise you read WP:Notability, as the vast majority of articles that don't get published fail because the submitter does not understand our Notability guideline. Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aid on the Edge of Chaos 92)

Hello MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Aid on the Edge of Chaos 92)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aid on the Edge of Chaos 92)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

World Flag

Thank you for letting me know. Understanding why is a great help. At a later time, I will do more research and may then return to the idea. In the meantime, all the best, ~~Joan Silver~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joan Silver (talk • contribs) 04:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 20:00:36, 8 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Virgolove22


Happy New Year! I am trying to figure out how I can get additional references or add additional references for my article that you denied. Draft:Rudy "DJ Flava" Davis I cited the one reference that I received the information from.

Virgolove22 (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atul Auto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saurashtra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

how remove rejection?

I explained what I was trying to do with the instrumentalism article. Please tell me how to remove the rejection notice from my sandbox so I can proceed. Thanks.TBR-qed (talk) 15:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello TBR-qed, there's no point removing the rejection notice, as that specific draft will not publish because by definition we don't publish drafts for things we already have a published version on the same topic. As replied earlier on this page, just start copying content out of your draft and pasting it into the current Instrumentalism article, being sure as you do so that you leave a clear Edit Summary in the little box right under the editing window.
If you haven't already, make sure you read my reply to you higher up on this page, since I give more suggestions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

LC Matzal article

Matthew, thank you for reviewing my first article attempt! I'll work on getting a photo to post up and follow your guidance...

Thanks again! Ralph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rctillinghast (talk • contribs) 00:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Askari Sisterhood

Dear Mr. Vanitas,

My article for the Askari Sisterhood was declined. Since this is my first article & I still wish to publish it, can you please give me clear directions on what necessary changes would make it acceptable? Thanks so very much!


Kenny L. Mitchell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmitch672004 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Kenny, did you read the instructions in the pink box at top of your draft? The guideline Wikipedia:Notability (fictional characters) explains what features an article about a fictional character/group. My biggest initial concern was that it appears the book Loves Me Not Volume One: Beautiful Broken Me doesn't even have its own article on Wikipedia. If there's no article on the book itself, it's pretty hard to justify having a whole article about one aspect of the book.
If I'm wrong and we do have an article about the book, let me know. If we don't have an article about the book and you want to start one, you absolutely must read WP:Notability (books) before doing so. There are very specific things that book articles must have, you can't just tell the author and plot and link an Amazon page, you must show that the book has been discussed by professional writers/critics/etc so that we actually have some perspective in the article. It is not at all enough to simply show that a given book exists.
If you want to write an article on the author, I'd strongly advise reading WP:Notability (authors).
That said, it appears that you yourself are the author of the book. It is a very bad idea to write an article about yourself or your work. Please see WP:Autobiography for an explanation of why you probably don't want to do that, most particularly because you will have no control over the article about you, so if anything bad ever happens (lawsuit, etc) somebody else will assuredly add it to the article.
Hope this helps, post back here if you have any follow-up questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Arabeasy

Hi Matthew,

The article was rejected for lack of notability, could you please inform what more is necessary on top of being being published here: http://www.jolace.com/en/sluzby/a2-1-january-2014/ and about 600 users here https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/arabeasy-view-the-arabic/endioigfhooioekhpnbnmejhbdopoocf?hl=en https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/type-arabeasy-arabic-on-l/makncdgkhgjppmehkcgncbikakkdhndp?hl=en

Also, learners of Arabic (myself) have different needs and intentions than Arabic-speaking linguists when it comes to the transcription of Arabic, both of which merit being embraced by wikipedia.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.102.130.201 (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

188.102.130.201, I review hundreds of article per week; which one are you referring to? I can't tell by your account which one, since you're using a different IP address than you used to write the article, so the article isn't associated with this IP. If you have a Wikipedia account please log in prior to posting on Talk pages so it's easier to figure out what I'm dealing with. If you want to stay an IP, that's fine, but you must post a link when asking someone about a page, since we are not mind readers. MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/ArabEasy_(software) it is primarily a transliteration map from arabic to latin, not software — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.102.130.201 (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

188.102.130.201, are you the same person as User:Ouiliam? If so, please sign in to your account before editing, as it makes this way easier to follow. If you're not, you have the right to post from an IP, but I'd suggest reading Wikipedia:Why register? for why having an account helps.
The main answer to your question is that you are not understanding the policy WP:Notability. Your only link right now is one article at the Journal of Language and Cultural Education. I have no idea how prominent this publication is, but there's no Wikipedia article for it, which isn't a convincing sign it's famous/reputed. Secondly, the person who wrote the JOLACE article appears to be the someone directly involved with the project; you can't just write about your own work and claim it's famous.
Notability requires you show that a body of independent professional news/info sources discuss the subject, not that it has a website, not that its own employees have written about it. I strongly advise you read WP:Notability which explains what we do need, or read the 10-second version at WP:42. That should answer most of your questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

updates to my page as Ira Blacker

Hi Matthew, thank you for your help with the changes. I have changed all book references to the appropriate Google ones. However websites, PDF's and wiki pages were not able to be changed. Are they OK as per the links I have or is there something else I need do? Thank you Ira1942 (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Amna Suraka Museum

Yes I have many pics of this museum! Great idea...I will draft it soon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neuroforever (talk • contribs) 19:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Here is a tasty desert of appreciation for all your contributions... TheKevlar 19:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited .41 Special, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GP-100. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your invite

Hi Mathew,

I would love to get together to discuss editing my article in which i tried to submit. Unfortunately I missed the time suggested due to work. Also I am still new to this and wasn't quite sure how to reply. My source info for it all is directly from the founder of the martial art i was trying to describe. Any help would be beyond appreciated. I am available Jan 20 if that helps at all. Once again I appreciate your offer and help. I hope all is well. Please take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TKDMaster069 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello TKDMaster069, the important thing to bear in mind is that Wikipedia does not accept WP:Original research. That is, we cannot accept things that are in your head or notebook. We can only accept things from published works, from sources that anyone could, in theory, contact the right library and get a copy of, pull up on a news archive, etc. Please see WP:Reliable sources for ideas.
Rather than just rely on me, I suggest you post your questions/concerns at WP:Teahouse, a page where helpful volunteer mentors are happy to give advice. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

16:38:41, 19 January 2015 review of submission by JamesLobley7


Hi Matthew,

Appreciate you taking the time to look at the page. I'm just pondering over the comments left, any chance you could elaborate the 'Amateur sports teams generally do not rate their own article' comment, I personally don't understand the point you were trying to put across, also what is meant by the reference point.

If you can reply It'd be greatly appreciated

Thanks, James

JamesLobley7 (talk) 16:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello JamesLobley7, the clearest answer to your question would be to take a quick glance at WP:Notability, or if you want the 10-second version, this [[WP:42|summary of the guideline. Fundamentally, for a topic/concept to have an article on Wikipedia, it must be something that is documented by uninvolved parties who have credibility, and must have a larger significance recognized by said authorities. That's not a value judgment, many important things are poorly documented, and many trivial things have whole books we can cite about them. But generally speaking most local sports teams are only written about on non-professional sources like Facebook, blogs, etc. or in purely-local newspapers. If, for example, the West Whatevershire FC were written about extensively by authors, academics, etc. for some curious features (having been in existence for three centuries, being the first in the UK to be racially integrated, etc), then that would merit it an article. However, 99.9% of local sports teams are just that, some pleasant folks who like to get together and play ball occasionally. Which is a perfectly fine thing to do, there's just not any compelling reason that a Wikipedia reader in, say, Brazil or Sudan in the year 2045 would really need such an article to inform their understanding of the world.
That's my phrasing of it, but WP:Notability or the summary WP:42 explain this absolute requirement more concretely. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Thomas(ine) Hall

The article is certainly eligible for DYK inclusion, although there is (or was a sevn-day time limit. I suggest you follow the instructions at WP:DYK. If you have questions, ask at WP:HELP and in either case someone will assist. I have a aper due the 23rd, so I will be busy, but can take a look if you ping me. The big thing is making sure the article is well referenced, and having a catchy hook that is explicitly supported by a reference or references. Also, you get much more prominence if there's a free picture available to illustrate the listing. 05:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


Your draft article, User:Poochigo/D'Amante

Hello MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "D'Amante".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Poochigo/D'Amante}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 11:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

So what is the best option possible where I can verify or show that I own rights to logos and website and I am not infringing on copyright issues?

~ID

Draft by R.azz.miligi

Matthew, thank you for reviewing my article attempt I'll work on getting it better. Dear sire I am not an ordinary researcher I am an engineer retired from .... many years so I am an old man fond of ancient Egyptian history and specially ancient Egyptian language. I discovered a lot of things the most important subject is the famous ancient Egyptian language called hieroglyphic is not exactly the speaking lang. of the ancient Egyptians. Also the symbolic images are interpreted wrongly. A lot of mistakes in names ex : "SA YAMON CALLED SI YAMON" although it gives different meaning. I need to record my point of view to clear such mistakes affecting the ancient Egyptian history. thanks again . R.azz.miligi (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello R.azz.miligi, the problem is you're trying to submit your personal research. Wikipedia is not an academic journal, it is a compilation of existing published research. Facts that you personally are researching from scratch are not admissible until they are published in a peer-reviewed book or journal. Wikipedia simply cannot use raw materials, as we are a WP:Tertiary source.
Please see our guideline WP:No original research. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello: Matthew, thank you for reviewing my  article attempt.

you mentioned to me this .... the problem is you're trying to submit your personal research. Wikipedia is not an academic journal,.....

Dear sire ... I did not write a story from my own imagination the whole subject selected from Wikipedia articles like Nefertiti and Taduhepa . As a matter of fact the results of my research are compatible with selective informations in Wikipedia;I have to use.

Please give me the chance and help to improve my article.

thanks to you Matthew. R.azz.miligi (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by R.azz.miligi (talk • contribs) 18:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello R.azz.miligi, I'm not saying you wrote it "from your imagination", I'm pointing out that any research which involves your personal conclusions, discoveries, theories, deductions, etc. is not admissible in an encyclopedia. You could submit your research to a history journal, a newspaper, etc. but an encyclopedia can only cite existing published works.
Again, I strongly advise you read WP:No original research which will explain this much clearer than I can. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Matthew
Thank you v. much . I got it.
Thanks again for your patient and politeness.

R.azz.miligi (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

So what is the best option possible where I can verify or show that I own rights to logos and website and I am not infringing on copyright issues?

~ID — Preceding unsigned comment added by IllyrianDodona (talk • contribs) 16:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

For logos, you can upload one logo under Fair Use; see WP:Logo for that.
Hello IllyrianDodona! So far as text copyright: I wouldn't bother trying to release it, because text from an "About Us!!!" page is almost always not usable for Wikipedia. If you want to write about the ISA, you must provide citations to news/academic reporting about the organization. Simply writing about the organization based on its own materials will never get it published.
Also, you don't seem to be understanding that if you "release" something, you can't simply do a "you can use this on Wikipedia, but nowhere else". If you release your rights to the text or images (except for one logo as mentioned), those rights are gone, you are no longer the private owner of that text/image. Technically, you've already agreed to do that just by pasting your text onto the draft, so I would remove that text for your legal rights as well.
I strongly suggest you read WP:Notability (organizations) which explains the requirements, and should really clear things up. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Good Pitch Hello, I have fleshed out the article with the 'notability' in mind - you understand there are few academically rigorous texts dealing with film as it happens, but a few articles I have linked to where films have had an impact. I have included updated relevances with showing that the Good Pitch model is a very top end documentary supporter - Academy Award nominees, and mainstream top end festival attendees and prizes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobyjaws56 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Good Pitch declined article

Thank you for your feedback, I note that contemporary films, especially feature documentaries, are hard to get rigorous articles for, so I am hoping my attempts to show that Good Pitch is a top end model, which has had a significant impact on both funding of and mention of top end feature docs. I have illustrated this with links to the recent Academy Award nominees, and to social impact in the USA for one film. There are several others I can include if this type of citation is acceptable.

I appreciate your time. Mobyjaws56 (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Vandeventer Black LLP

I received your email stating that the draft I submitted was declined as it appeared to be a duplicate of another draft - I did not mean to submit the draft twice...but how do I check the status of the first draft that I submitted to see if has been approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristen Fletcher (talk • contribs) 16:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Cristen Fletcher! Right now you have drafts at:
Please pick the one you want to keep, and on the other one delete all the writing on the page, and add {{db-self}} so it can be removed to avoid confusion. You can tell whether a draft is in line to be reviewed by checking the page (top and bottom) for a yellow "awaiting review" template. If there isn't one showing, the green or pink box on the page should have a "submit" button. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks. I have deleted the content in the Vandeventer Black LLP (2) submission as you requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristen Fletcher (talk • contribs) 16:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc.

Good day

can you review my article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jetlee_Yusi_Tiongco

and i would like to ask how can i move my article into draft? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kkpk091811/Kapampangan_Ku_Pagmaragul_Ku_(KKPK)_International_Inc.

thanks and best regards Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc. (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

16:59:02, 24 January 2015 review of submission by RWTJ


CTCC 16:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Do not understand what is being asked for here? Thanks for any help I can get. Hope I am doing this right. CTCC 16:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello User:RWTJ, have you read the guideline WP:Notability (organizations)? If not, I suggest that. If you want the 10-second version of the rule, please read WP:42. Either of those links should explain the issue; post back here and let me know if you read those and are still confused. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:FreeCinc concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FreeCinc, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

political fairness

I'm disappointed that, since I'm merely a candidate in the UK General Election (not elected), I'm not allowed to have my own wiki article (it was rejected for this reason only). This gives the current MP, and any other candidate who qualifies for their own article, an advantage. It's perfectly reasonable to expect voters to want to read about all candidates before voting. British media will always give greater coverage to larger parties. Indeed, the aforementioned Telegraph & Argus was the only paper to even mention my candidacy.

Similarly, Yorkshire First do not qualify for any election coverage on TV and radio, even if they stand in every one of the 54 seat in Yorkshire.

Wikipedia strives for neutrality and equality, unlike other media. I believe candidates for major elections should be allowed to have an article, providing the usual rules are obeyed. The page should not endorse or criticize their policies, but merely state what they are with valid references.

If the rules cannot be reformed, would it make a difference if I mention my work as an author and street actor?

Regards Bob Buxton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbobyorkshire (talk • contribs) 18:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Drbobyorkshire, the policy on politicians isn't a fully voted/vetted one, but it gives us a basic grounding to start with. I'll also note that writing about yourself is a very bad idea, I really suggest you read WP:Autobiography for an explanation of why this is a bad idea. Among other things, such a page would not be "your own", you would have no particular control or rights over the content, so if there is any verifiable negative information about you, it would assuredly be added to the article too, and if it's properly sourced you would not be allowed to remove it.
The reason candidates generally don't merit their own articles, unlike seated politicians (at a certain level and up), is that candidates generally don't have lasting fame as candidates (barring high-level ones like PM/President/etc). Generally once an election is over, candidates such as MP candidates drop out of the news and aren't discussed again. I understand your argument that this gives an "unfair advantage" to sitting politicians in a race, but this is true only insomuch as a published author with a body of critical review has an "unfair advantage" over an author who has one self-published novel that nobody in the press or academia has taken note of.
Fundamentally, the policy is WP:Notability: is this person talked about in news media, academia, etc for their acts/accomplishments. If your primary "claim to fame" is being a candidate, that doesn't generally fly. If you are famous, receiving more than just passing mention in news, or purely-local coverage, for either your acting career or academic career, you might potentially rate an article for that, but such could not be used as just a platform to advocate your candidacy. I'll note as well that a lot of your draft is just mirroring your campaign literature with the rather transparent device of appending "Buxton says" in front of it.
In the end, my main suggestions are: don't try to use Wikipedia to advertise/advocate any person or thing (that is, don't come in with a non-neutral priority from the get-go), and don't write about yourself. Really, if nobody in the world cares more about writing an article about you than you do, that doesn't make a compelling case that a lot of people would want to read it. If you believe you fame merits an article, have faith in your fame, and that some neutral party who doesn't even know you personally will find you compelling enough to write about. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 25 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Kalicherla article data is getting Removed

Hi MatthewVanitas,

I have observed that you are deleting the content of this article "Kalicherla". I am afraid to say that there are no many others from my village who can edit this article. Looking at your comments it seems that there are no significant contributors for this article. But, I can assure you that this information if accurate to my knowledge.

Please let me know, in case you need any supporting content that I can provide to maintain the article data as is.

Thanks, Inthiyaz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intuyes (talk • contribs) 12:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Intuyes, I do sympathize that there are many, many facts in the world that are known to people but are not officially recorded, but fundamentally Wikipedia policy requires that facts be verifiable through a formal source, such as news articles, academic papers, government pages, etc. We simply cannot accept personal testimony. For a clearer explanation of why this is our policy, please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
On second look, your article was published on 2 January, it is posted at Kalicherla. What was declined was your later attempt to create a redundant draft on the same topic. Note that at Kalicherla I had to remove all but the most basic facts, since again they are not cited to anything other than your personal knowledge, but because the existence of the village itself is cited to government records (note the footnote on the page), the page itself is allowed to stand. Please only add further facts if you can clearly cite them to formal sources. Thanks for your addition of this article to our India coverage! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Vandeventer article

Thank you for your feedback Matthew. I have read the guidelines. I based the body of this article on that of LeClair Ryan's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeClairRyan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristen Fletcher (talk • contribs) 14:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Cristen Fletcher, unfortunately it's a very common error for new editors to just pick any article in their field and use it as an example. The LeClair article was terrible, I've made some major chops to it, marked it as problematic, etc.
If you want to find quality articles to emulate, please note the chart on the right side of this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies. The chart links you to articles rated as "Featured article", "Good Article", etc. amongst company articles. Those would be a far better place to find a similar firm and emulate their layout.
So far as Draft:Vandeventer Black LLP, what you have right now will not fly, as you're still not showing a body of coverage of the company, from outside eyes. To summarize, here's the 10-second version of Notability:

Articles generally require significant coverage

in reliable sources

that are independent of the topic.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Samuelmithanga/The Expendables (film series) down load

You have marked this as a copyright violation, but it doesn't seem to me to have any content at all. Am I missing something? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello JohnCD, maybe I didn't use the best tag. It appears as though someone is attempting/about to use the page to direct people to download a film. Maybe CV isn't the best tag; better to delete as Advert or No Content? MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I have deleted it as G2 test page, told him why, and pointed him to WP:YFA and the Article Wizard. We'd best keep an eye to see what he does next. JohnCD (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive_38&oldid=803576094"