User talk:Matthew W Bradley

Matthew W Bradley, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Matthew W Bradley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:George Brauchler has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:George Brauchler. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Brauchler (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Honestly, because he's only best known for that one particular case, that would be inherited notability, and such claims are not acceptable for establishing his independent notability; with this, there's still nothing for establishing his own article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Brauchler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:George Brauchler concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:George Brauchler, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Clarence Thomas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Notre Dame is not among the schools listed in the New Yorker article cited for this content. If you want to add additional information, you will need to add additional sources. General Ization ^Talk 18:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]