User talk:Max Stylinson

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of cities by number of billionaires, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Central Park Tower has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Auric talk 16:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Central Park Tower, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 07:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Well it seem it is not you first attempt to remove citation and content without providing any valid reason at all. Matthew hk (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on James Charles (Internet personality). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Editing

As has been stated to you before, do not edit Wikipedia based on your personal opinion. We go by what WP:Reliable sources state and with WP:Due weight; read those pages for what I mean. Do not engage in WP:Synthesis or WP:Editorializing; read those pages for what I mean. Also, as noted at WP:Non-English, the English Wikipedia prefers English sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on LGBT community; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adam9007 (talk) 22:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Keep up your edit warring and other disruptive editing at Wikipedia articles, and you are likely to find yourself WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Ammonia

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Ammonia, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

I undid this edit of yours at Economy of Chile. I can't decide if this was vandalism, or some kind of weird misunderstanding on your part. In any case, giving you the benefit of the doubt, it was completely unsourced, and Wikipedia requires sources for all assertions. Please read WP:Verifiability. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Maple Leaf Square, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 01:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Color. Canterbury Tail talk 01:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 01:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)