User talk:Mbell 791983
On Zamboanga City Entry
[edit]
Indeed they're all the same. They have these shopping malls, restaurants with a section header Where to eat, among other stuffs. Please be careful on adding such because it tends to be a commercially written prose/article. Wikipedia is neither a commercial site nor an updater posting advertisements. Other articles may have some but in a limited sense and were carefully written to not violate wiki policy. Please read this-Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. With the articles you presented to me as your reason, see its history and most editors are IPs so its not that reliable and credible. Also, these pages were not yet edited or cleaned-up and if you can see, these were tagged with {{clean-up}} and other maintenance tags for others to know what to do with such pages. If you read my reasons at the talk page of this article, I clearly stated-
Recent revision
[edit]Cheers! Your revision is quite fine but still there are some excessive portions. If you want, please help me because I've been cleaning-up. They're too many, it's going to be a grueling task. Don't worry. If you want to remove voraciously on some pages, be sure to paste it in their corresponding talk pages to not lose possible important content. Also, clearly state your reasons with the recent removal. Thank you. --βritand&βeyonce (talk•contribs) 01:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that you have the reason on removing unnecessary content on the article. We shall also help improving each entry by removing unneccessary portions of the article.
- Oh, I forgot. If you will remove a big portion of just a small one, please indicate your reasons in the edit summary so that it will not look like a vandal and so that other users will understand what you did and will not revert it back. By the way, if you want to talk, only talk, not the recent talk you had with me (Don't paste it again). Hehe. I was surprised, I thought someone get mad at me, its very long. (Ginoo ko, and gi.erase ra man d.i to nga portion kay sa Pagadian City.) Cheers! --βritand&βeyonce (talk•contribs) 07:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pagadian City. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety 03:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing an edit summary for your last edit to Pagadian City. Tiptoety 03:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Recent articles made
[edit]- List of Restaurants and Hotels in Zamboanga City
- List of television and radio stations in Zamboanga City
I have to nominate these pages for deletion because it's not appropriate for a Wikipedia to have a list of "where abouts." There's a place for that, http://wikitravel.org/en/Zamboanga_City, and if you have comments, leave a message on my talk page or directly go to Zamboanga City's talk page becuase user:Seav commented already their. Thank you. --βritand&βeyonce (talk•contribs) 06:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mbell 791983 23:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC) The list of hotels and restaurants should be in the Wikitravel. However, the list of broadcast stations should not be deleted since it is a separate article.
- Yes. That was my comment to save the content and the other one, per discussion, will be kept but the title will be modified a bit. --βritand&βeyonce (talk•contribs) 03:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ayala, Zamboanga City, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Cabatangan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Pasonanca, Zamboanga City, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Tetuan, Zamboanga City, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Tumaga, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tetuan, Zamboanga City
[edit]
An editor has nominated Tetuan, Zamboanga City, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetuan, Zamboanga City and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tumaga
[edit]An editor has nominated Tumaga, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumaga and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN Regional Network Group
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN Regional Network Group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN Regional Network Group
[edit]
I have nominated List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN Regional Network Group, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Please remember that someone may come across a Wikipedia article by hitting "Random article", so it needs to make clear what the article is about in the opening sentence, the lead. I've amended this article to put it in context, but another time please do so yourself. Thanks. PamD (talk) 09:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for writing this excellent article :). Can I ask, however, that you use references in future? Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kakabakaba Ka Ba?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pasukob
[edit]
The article Pasukob has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Gaisano Capital Pagadian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Limtown Center Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 07:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Shoppers' Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Mbell 791983. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Pasonanca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
SeanJ 2007 (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
The article South Seas Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXXX-TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.