User talk:Mcaserta

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Jesus Maria Espinosa to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.

Por favor, no contribuya con textos en español a la Wikipedia en inglés. En cambio, sus contribuciones a la Wikipedia en español, serán muy bienvenidas.

Please do not contribute text in Spanish to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at Spanish Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandra eichler

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sandra eichler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sandra Eichler, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 04:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. The article was deleted as a promotional page, not for lack of notability. Incidentally, you should not remove speedy deletion tags yourself, especially if you haven't addressed the issues. It's pointless anyway, a bot will restore the tag even if the removal is missed by a human editor. I deleted your article because

It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: both well known opera singers... showed her journalistic skills... actress, cultural manager, beautiful figure... in her blood she brings the music and the scene... knows that her heritage is a mandate and she sticks to it... a social communicator... renowned opera singers... marked her destiny as an actress... further demonstrating her qualities as a singer... a lot of strength playing roles in many novels... promoting the musical heritage inherited from her parents... high quality musical performances and art in general... Undoubtedly, Sandra Eichler is a woman whose talent, studies and her multicultural heritage is a huge contribution to the culture and the media in general... — this isn't an encyclopaedia article, it's a eulogy.
Although it's not the main reason for deletion, you need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave a list of references at the end, they are bare urls which are hard to read, and they are not in line, so we don't know what fact each is verifying. I haven't checked them all, but this and this at least are not independent sources as defined above.
Her notability can be found all over the internet in hundreds of references — that's as may be, but that doesn't help with the promotional issue.

I'll look again at the other deleted page to see if it can be salvaged Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't realised initially that the article was that old, so I looked through the history to see if there was an acceptable version. I saw that the article was created by you, and you added most of the substantive content. The issues were the same

Flowery promotional prose making unsupported claims. I can list them as I did above if you wish, but you should get the idea.
The only reference is to an apparently non-existent web page.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mcaserta, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler

Hello Mcaserta. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sandra Eichler".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Eichler}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]