User talk:Meeanaya/Archives/2019/October

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Aachhat.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that it needs to be more fully integrated with the rest of Wikipedia. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Jaswantgarh (Udaipur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jaswantgarh (Udaipur), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaswantgarh (Udaipur) has been accepted

Jaswantgarh (Udaipur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	You deserve it for cleaning 🧹 the spam on Wikipedia. Thanks me later. :) Harshil want to talk? 12:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Meeanaya. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

I have gone through New Pages Review. Thank you. Meeanaya (talk) 04:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Page review

Can you look into a page Draft:Jayride, it has detailed news coverage from The Australian, Business Insider, The Australian Financial Review, Entrepreneur (magazine), WSAU and others. It is there in draft and I dont know what to do next. 157.37.204.246 (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

I do not have rights at AFC, I will check what I can do if the subject is notable. Meeanaya (talk) 04:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Meeanaya (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Lakewood Lancers

Hi, I'd like to ask if you wouldn't mind looking at a page that was delted called "Lakewood Lancers," and please tell me what is missing or wrong with it that it continues to be deleted? It's a page merely sharing the history of a team, and I sent an email earlier regarding the common use of copyright material. All of the material including text and images is owned by me, so it has been donated for use here, but no one has replied to my email about the release. I would appreciate your time. Thanks. BigRed66BigRed66 (talk) 04:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

BigRed66, please go through WP:GNG, hope it helps. Meeanaya (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

John Francis Moss

Thank you for reviewing so quickly. I reread the Tone guidelines this morning, but I could not see anything obvious, 1st person, exclamation, for example. Can you offer me some more specific section I need to focus on? I will reread the guidelines again meantime and thank you for your patience. ~~Ged~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gedgmoss (talk • contribs) 08:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Is your comment on tone directed at the quote Father of Education in Sheffield (Puffery) ? Gedgmoss (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Ged

A few resources will help, WP:CONTENT, WP:GNG and WP:5P. Meeanaya (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Lina Caceres

Please tell me why you transferred Lina caceres to draft and why you want to delete Catalina maya's wikipedia whats missing??

Topmartz (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

The page fails WP:GNG, it needs to pass through WP:AFC. Meeanaya (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

WP:AGF

On what basis do you believe Cecilia Harvey is "Created by undisclosed paid editor" as you said at AfD? That's quite an accusation to throw around. No-one has suggested it on the creating editor's talk page, nor (till just now) dropped a welcome template there. Yes, it's the first article they have created, but everyone starts somewhere: do you suspect that they are a sockpuppet of another editor? PamD 11:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

PamD, I am not sure if I am not smart enough. But it is 1,000% paid editing from a big sock farm. It was a proper planned perfect execution, the biggest hint I got with the photo, a private, nice high quality photo uploaded on commons from flickr. So first, a new flickr account created in October 2019, Photo was uploaded on flickr on 15 Oct, uploaded on commons on 17 Oct, page editing started on sandbox from 10 Oct, made over 10 edits, got auto confirmed account and moved to mainspace on 21 October with no errors. Meeanaya (talk) 06:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)