User talk:Mewuragap

September 2024

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I didn't add any defamatory content to any article here. Mewuragap (talk) 01:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about redirecting people's names to target to antisemitism. I've deleted them as WP:G10s. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the Kate Hikes thing. I apologize about that. Mewuragap (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you make further disparaging redirects like Pajeetland you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pajeetland" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pajeetland has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Pajeetland until a consensus is reached. Noorullah (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Noorullah (talk) 21:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Gamer mosley" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gamer mosley has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Gamer mosley until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also nominated Gamer Mosley for consideration at WP:RFD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mewuragap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I am sorry for what I did and won't vandalize Wikipedia by making racist redirects. Mewuragap (talk) 08:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what edits you will make instead, nor does it convince me that you will be able to set aside your racism to participate here, on this community project where people of different races, religions, genders, etc. all civilly work together. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block appeal 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mewuragap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise, I won't abuse my autoconfirmed privilege by making such redirects and instead make productive edits on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This unblock request makes no attempt to explain the reasons you made those edits to begin with, nor that you understand why it was problematic or that it would not continue. - Aoidh (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mewuragap (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) What sort of productive edits do you intend to make on Wikipedia? QwertyForest (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposed to any unblocking absent a very convincing explanation for what looks like blatantly racist vandalism. See the discussion at ANI. Normally I am all for second chances, but there are some lines that can't be crossed. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse Ad Orientem's analysis of this matter. Cullen328 (talk) 18:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Syracuse, Free municipal consortium of Syracuse

Hello, Mewuragap

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Syracuse, Free municipal consortium of Syracuse, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Syracuse, Free municipal consortium of Syracuse.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-1ctinus📝🗨 18:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #93004

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]