Jump to content

User talk:MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Recent edit to Rachael Lillis

[edit]

while helpful, it will need to be updated after each birthday, there's a template to do this automatically Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rev Theory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • band formed in 2002 in [[North Andover, Massachusetts]]. The band has released three studio albums [''[[Truth Is Currency]]'' (2005), ''[[Light It Up (Rev Theory album)|Light It Up]]'' (2008) and ''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lightning McQueen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • , ''[[Cars (film)]]'', ''[[Mater and the Ghostlight]]'', ''[[Cars (video game)]]'', ''[[Cars 2]]'') <br/>[[Keith Ferguson (voice actor)|Keith Ferguson]] (''[[Cars Toons: Mater's Tall Tales|Cars
  • , ''[[Cars Mater-National Championship]]'', ''[[Cars Race-O-Rama]]'', ''[[Cars 2 (video game)]]'')

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bsk64. As you no doubt realised would happen, this account has been blocked from editing. Any edits you have made that have not already been followed up by other editors will also be reverted. Do you know, it's really simple: unless and until you make a successful request to have your original account unblocked, you are not permitted to edit here. Each time you use a new sockpuppet account, or edit from a new IP address without an account, you may think you are getting away with it for a while, but sooner or later you will be found out, and time you spent working here will be wasted, as your edits will be undone. After this, if I find you have been evading your block yet again, I am willing to revert all the sockpuppet edits you make, even if it means spending a bit of time tracking down edits lost in the past editing history of an page. Why? Because I am sadistic, and like being unpleasant to you? No, not at all. Then why? Because experience shows that making it clear to a serial sockpuppeteer that anything they do here will just be reverted is the thing with the best chance of persuading them that it is a waste of their time, and they may as well stop. Easy: either request an unblock of your original account, or anything you do here is likely to be undone.

Can you unblock my talk page access on my original account please, so I can make and unblock request. MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you pleeeeaaaase unblock my talk page access on my original account. Please. MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 18:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to have another chance. Please unblock my talk page access on my original account, I don't know what's taking you so long to reply? MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

JamesBWatson, please, I want to have another chance, one final chance. Since I won't get unblocked here, can you unblock my talk page access on my original account please so I can make a unblock request there. Please can I have a second chance?

Decline reason:

You may request unblock of your original account by following the directions at WP:UTRS. They will, of course, take your history of abusing multiple accounts under consideration. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't! Don't block my talk page access please. James don't listen to WritingEnthusiast14, I didn't mean it. Don't block my talk page access. I was just upset, I'm getting really nervous here right now. I won't post anymore insults. Please please please please please please please please don't block it, PLEEEEEEAAAAAAASE! MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please James I'm begging you. Don't remove my talk page access please!!!!!!!! =( MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 23:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't block it!!!!!

[edit]

I'm sorry James, Please don't block my talk page access. But can you please unblock my talk page access on my original account please!

I promise I won't edit war, I won't say anymore threats, I won't remove anymore comments from my talk page, and everything else I won't do. I promise all that. I won't any of that stuff ever again, just please don't block my talk page access here. I just want to make one more unblock request on my original account. Not here, on my original account once my talk page access there gets unblocked. I will follow the rules and find sources for now on. MickeyMouseTheCoolGuy46 (talk) 23:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you need to use this talk page anymore. --jpgordon::==( o ) 01:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you ever come back and read this, you may like to think about the editing you have done to this page since being blocked, and try to imagine what impression it would make on anyone assessing an unblock request from you on UTRS. Do you really think there is any chance at all of an unblock? And "I was just upset, I'm getting really nervous" is no answer, because if every time yo are upset about something you are likely to go in for childish outbursts like that, then you can't be trusted to edit. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here is a bit of advice on how to try to get unblocked, if you do come back and read this. Right now, the likelihood of your being unblocked (on any account) is zero. Your silly edits to this page made sure of that. However, that does not mean that you can never be unblocked. Leave Wikipedia for a year. Then you will be a year older. I assume, from the way you behave, that you are fairly young at present: if so, a year older will mean a year's more maturity. During that year, don't try to evade your block at all, whether by creating more accounts or by editing without logging in. Come back after a year, and request an unblock, in the way explained at Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. In your request, explain what you think was wrong with what you did in the past, explain how what you do in the future will be different, and try to make it clear that you really have changed. I can't promise that you will be unblocked, because that will be up to whoever reviews your request at the Unblock Ticket Request System, but I honestly think that is your best chance of being unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
After reading his edit summaries, it looks like he has no desire to change. He cussed at you but then apologized and stated he won't do it again but he keeps doing it anyways. AcidSnow (talk) 02:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]