Jump to content

User talk:Minna Sora no Shita/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 3    Archive 4    Archive 5 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  ... (up to 100)


reliability

Can you tell me what the reliability problem is with the article?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Play_It_Straight — Preceding unsigned comment added by EP PUB (talk • contribs) 19:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I still don't get how Business Better Bureau and Business Week isn't considered third party reliable sources. Both are well known and if those don't count, what do I have to put in my references to get it accepted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Crestline

Hi, I added some references to my article, Please consider searching by parts of the name to find more results . Search with CYC, or Christian Youth Channel or Coptic Youth Channel . Also Consider that the channel is an eastern minority channel to server coptic youth worldwide, so you will not find many articles about it in western media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Christian_Youth_Channel_-_CYC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pola Edward (talk • contribs) 00:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New References

I added some new references to the article. I believe they are in the right place. EP PUB (talk) 21:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West Brook Wines

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/West Brook Wines Can you explain the reasons why the article has been declined?

capnjimnzCapnjimnz (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


sources & submission

Hi Minna Sora, can you please tell me how many times can I submit my article for review?? is there a limitation?? so that I can various sources for referencing to provide credibility for the article. thanks, Stuti.hk (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)stuti.hk[reply]

Reason for declining article

Hi Minna Sora Thanks for reviewing the article that I wrote. Earlier when you reviewed it you mentioned the comment but now I couldn't find any comment but a notice telling "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability". I read about notability and as per the article said I've mentioned reference links the notable websites in the domain my website deals with. Please let me know what should I add as "notable" thing in my article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talk • contribs) 09:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I view the comments of those who review my article?

Hello Minna where can I view the comments of those who review my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoneyArticleEditor (talk • contribs) 10:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Diamond_Nexus

Hello, I want to correct my article about Diamond Nexus so that it can be accepted into Wikipedia, given they make the crowns for the Miss Universe Org. and that is notable. I removed unsourced information and also cited a reference to the date that the Miss Universe Org. officially made them crown makers. Please let me know how this looks and what you would suggest that I also do to make it more notable, if needed.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemqueen46 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability question

Can you please tell me what the problem is concerning the notability in this article? My sources are legitimate, mainstream media outlets. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Slices

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Erinfwomack (talk • contribs) 19:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-assess blank article

I very recently submitted a blank article by mistake you rejected. I have corrected and resubmitted, made sure it wasn't blank, please re-assess and approve!

Reggie Sears

I am not quite sure I understand. I have listed notable sources I have a few more from "mainstream" publications. I am not understanding why you do not consider him "notable" enough, especially considering many of the clowns on here who have no notability or notoriety whatsoever with pages on here.

I am trying to author the wiki page for UniqTeas. It has been rejected twice due to inadequate citations. In the last request I added two citations from independent magazines. I am wondering if they were not good enough or do I just need more citations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcaraway (talk • contribs) 20:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster Blogging

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain

rgds

gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster Blogging

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain

rgds

gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster Blogging

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain

rgds

gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster Blogging

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain

rgds

gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster Blogging

Dear Minna,

The post which I added has not been accepted..why is that? Cud u pls explain

rgds

gayendraGayendra (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submission on my article

Hello, you have declined the submission of my article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/EXNESS). Could you please explain in details why is it? May be some advises? Julia.tretyakova (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Julia Tretyakova.[reply]

Regarding redirect of Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album)

It is a redirect. I clicked on the link and it redirected me to the article of Ariana Grande. Mr. Cookie 715 (talk) 00:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Hi Minna

As reported earlier I am still waiting for your answer. Could you please tell me what is "notable" for Wikipedia. I've included the most notable links related to the domain the company works with. You've been rejecting the articles but please provide the exact solution for the same. Thanks in advance. Waiting to get a reply from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talk • contribs) 04:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline of article

Hi Minna

As per your comment, I would like to bring into your notice that I've included links from uspto.gov, which is a reputed government site in U.S. Furthermore, our company is registered in Nasscom, which is another reputed organization in India. These two websites hold a good reputation and since we are Indian based company, being a registered member of Nasscom itself adds some authentication about the company. Please do reply me for the same. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talk • contribs) 07:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hello Minna

I am waiting for further comments from you. Please let me know about the notable links that i've mentioned in my article are notable for wikipedia or no. Waiting for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talk • contribs) 09:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Article re-submitted

Hi Minna

I've submitted the article once again, please let me know if it is alright now as per Wikipedia's guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilrock (talk • contribs) 10:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Minna Sora no Shita. You have new messages at Dodger67's talk page.
Message added 17:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar

Congratulations, Minna Sora no Shita! You're receiving The Golden Wiki Award and Content Reviewers Medal because you reviewed 1378 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you, Congratulations, and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I've been waiting for this for quite some time! You know, July was only my first month reviewing AfC submissions! --みんな空の下 (トーク) 17:54, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the wait - I had an family holiday is forgotten about! Anyway, congratulations on coming first (note - in future, it's easier now to put {{ping}} on your talk page when replying; It notifies the user in question you've replied to them) Mdann52 (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

STiki emergency

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

Sorry

Sorry
Sorry for editing your page. I have no idea this works and I am just a first time user. Killhead98 (talk) 23:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PrithvirajKothari

I would like to know the reason of the above mentioned page being deleted. Awaiting your reply. Thanks Nicola frenandes (talk) 09:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Ambivalent Love Addict

Every day I come to Wikipedia to find out how to get my article The Ambivalent Love Addict reconsidered. I keep being told that Five Sisters Ranch owns the copyright to my article and they do not. They allowed me to post my article on their blog and I did. How do I prove that I own the copyright to this term and all the articles I wrote to brand it.

The first article I submitted gave the history of the creation of the term and since that was rejected I re-wrote the article leaving myself out and just describing in simple terms what this term means. It is gaining momentum and I want credit. Is this a bad thing?

susanpeabody490 The Ambivalent Love Addict Copyright 2004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanpeabody490 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Attn: Minna Sora no Shita,

I haven't personally edited any Wikipedia pages in months, however I've found that my IP address (63.155.130.163) has been logged as the producer of several vandalism-rated or less-than-helpful edits to pages referencing the Madagascar movies. I'm not sure how this could be the case. Is it possible that someone is using my IP remotely? How can I investigate this? I would appreciate any guidance you can give me.

Regards,

Andrew Elam.

PS, I'm hesitant to publicly post an email address or phone number publicly, so please respond here with any feedback you have for me. I'll recheck this page within 24 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.155.130.163 (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that. The IP address seems to be shared, but are you accessing it from your home? --みんな空の下 (トーク) 07:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Your edit revert

Regarding youe edit revert here, I was trying to revert a robot revert of an edit at The Empress's Tomb where I had renoved a copyright violation (an enitre synospsis had been cut and pasted from a web page), placing a note on the Talk page. William Reid Boyd (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a biography of a living person.

Giles Deleuze died in 1995. So the fact that you think his article involves the biography of a living person speaks to a a lack of care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.171.30 (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prithviraj Kothari.

Hi Minna,

You replied that my article has been deleted because of copyright violation. Can you please elaborate and point out the violation.

ThanksNicola frenandes (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Thanks!

Thanks for fixing my block noticed. Busted not hitting preview again. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Username reporting

Thanks for raising problematic usernames at WP:UAA! I just wanted to say, though, that WP:UAA is different from other noticeboards regardin prior discussion before being brought to WP:UAA in the sense that if the username is blatant enough to be reported, then {{uw-username}} or {{uw-coi-username}} should not be added to the user's talk page. Otherwise it gives the impression that there's going to be a discussion about the user's username, when really an administrator (such as myself) will be coming around to softblock the editor until the username is changed. So if it is blatant, just bring it up at WP:UAA. If it is not blatant, discuss it with the editor, and then raise it at WP:RFCN if you cannot reach an agreement. See also instruction #4 at the WP:UAA page. Thanks again for bringing them to an administrator's attention! Singularity42 (talk) 20:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liviit

Hi Minna,

I have recently seen the article on Liviit has not been approved.

Do you have any tips so that I can be?

Cheers,

Matt

admin@liviit.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.172.170.152 (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probably it's not acceptable unless you understand WP:COI (conflict of interest) and WP:NPOV (neutral point of view)... --みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Hi Minna, I am a member of the Holy Synod of Milan, and I would like the true about our Holy Orthodox Church would be our duty and not the duty of the so-called Autonomous Metropolia of America, etc. If You want to compare the source see the page dedicated to Holy Synod of Milan in Orthodox Wiki (http://orthodoxwiki.org/Holy_Synod_of_Milan). In there the article is written with respect of the True. I think is our duty to care our page.

other sources - official website of the Holy Synod of Milan: http://mediolanum.me/

In next day I will correct the errors of the text about our church.

Thank You

Mons. Vladimir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volodymir (talk • contribs) 22:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline Anant Mane Article

Dear Minna,

Thank you for reviewing the article. As commented by you I have removed the IMDB link, as that was not the source of my research. This director is a historical figure and regional celebrity (Marathi language movie director) and my source is primarily from researching and translating Marathi web sites, magazine articles and the Marathi wikipedia page, and the international film database. This director is cross-referenced in several articles in wikipedia.

Thank you,

Vijay 162.108.31.52 (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Minna_Sora_no_Shita/Archive_4&oldid=1168304968"