- 1 A barnstar for you!
- 2 Vision therapy
- 3 Thank you!
- 4 GOCE January 2014 copy edit drive barnstar
- 5 Welcome
- 6 GOCE March drive awards
- 7 Cooper
- 8 Request for comment
- 9 Backlog drive
- 10 You don't need to add the word "Edition" to a cite template edition field.
- 11 GOCE March 2015 drive
- 12 deOrphaning script
A barnstar for you!
|The Editor's Barnstar|
|everyone needs an editor. thank you! Seergenius (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)|
Hi Molly have been talking to Anthonyhcole about editing the wiki page and have agreed with Brendan Barrett that I will write something conclusive which he will review before publication. Feel free to discuss this with Anthonyhcole as independent assessors and by all means with myself Peace Peaceful07 (talk) 09:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Little did you know how you helped me a couple of hours ago. Your Hurricane Sandy edit where you moved a sentence with the phrase "Hurricane Sandy-related deaths" drew that to my attention. And I thought, Shouldn't that hyphen be an en dash? But no, it should not, according to MOS:ENDASH. Only in a case like "pre–Hurricane Sandy", not here. So I reverted an old edit of mine to make the instances consistent. A minor, nitpicking point. Most Wikipedians would be yawning by now. But I'm sure you, a professional editor, can appreciate this. I used to earn a living as an editor myself. Yet I was never clear about this particular point. Shows that it's never too late to learn new things! --Alan W (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
GOCE January 2014 copy edit drive barnstar
|The Modest Barnstar|
|This barnstar is awarded to Molly-in-md for copy editing articles totalling 4000 words or more during the WP:GOCE January 2014 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Diannaa (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)|
GOCE March drive awards
|Leaderboard Award: Longest Article—3rd Place|
|This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Molly-in-md for copyediting a 12,708-word article during the GOCE March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations! Miniapolis 23:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)|
|Leaderboard Award: 5k Articles—4th Place|
|This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Molly-in-md for copyediting two 5k-equivalent articles during the GOCE March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations! Miniapolis 23:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)|
|The Tireless Contributor Barnstar|
|Thanks for copyediting a total of 24,869 words during the March GOCE backlog drive. We really appreciate your help! All the best, Miniapolis 23:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)|
Request for comment
Hello Molly-in-md, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by . Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
You don't need to add the word "Edition" to a cite template edition field.
Thanks for the updates to citations in the article Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. I noticed you filled out some citations that were just bare text references to published books, filling in the cite templates and the fields in the cite templates for those. But take a look at the documentation for the cite book template, because you will see that you do not need to add the word "edition" after an ordinal number shown in the edition field of the template. The examples shown for the use of the template make that clear, and the specific template documentation says, "Edition, series, volume edition: When the publication has more than one edition; for example: '2nd', 'Revised' etc. Displays ' ed.' after this field, so |edition=2nd produces '2nd ed.'" Your recent change to the article mark-up produces results in the references that are redundant, for example "(3rd Edition ed.)". I'll fix that. Thanks for filling out the bare references. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
GOCE March 2015 drive
|The Cleanup Barnstar|
|This barnstar is awarded to Molly-in-md for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words during the GOCE March 2015 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)|
|Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 5th Place|
|This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Molly-in-md for copyediting eight old articles during the GOCE March 2015 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)|
Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as 's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.came to my user talk page and said he
What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.