User talk:Mrblieu2011

Welcome!

Hello, Mrblieu2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Paige Bradley, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paige Bradley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paige Bradley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your interest in Wikipedia and for the article you posted earlier, Paige Bradley. Unfortunately, it appeared to be substantively the same as [1]; it may not have been copyright infringement in the usual sense since you state that you are working with the artist, but that page does not indicate its copyright status, which defaults to all rights reserved. Wikipedia articles are licensed by WP:CC-BY-SA, a Creative Commons license that allows for redistribution by any third party for pretty much any purpose, including commercial use, without recompense or prior consultation. Please see also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. If you control the material at that site, the simplest way to release it under a compatible license is simply to put a notice of copyright on the relevant pages. Please be aware, though, that any such release will apply to use and re-use by anyone and everyone, not just Wikipedia; moreover, the article here will be edited and will in time come to no longer reflect the original text. There is a secondary concern, in that articles here need to focus on summarizing how topics have been treated in independent reliable sources, such as newspapers, trade publications, and books from respected publishing houses, and should not be unduly self-promoting. Please see Wikipedia:Your first article for some more helpful advice on getting into the swing of encyclopedia writing. I can provide a copy of the deleted article so you do not lose the work you have already invested, if you would like. If you have any questions or I may help with anything, please do not hesitate to swing by my talkpage. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 00:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Paige Bradley creating a patina on bronze sculpture.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paige Bradley creating a patina on bronze sculpture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Expansion Sculpture by Paige Bradley.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Expansion Sculpture by Paige Bradley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Elizabeth Barlow?

You have uploaded several paintings by Elizabeth Barlow which you claimed are your own work. If you are Elizabeth Barlow, you need to be aware of Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest. If you are not Elizabeth Barlow, you need permission from her as the copyright holder to upload these images. Uploading images to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons requires them to be released under a free licence. Un assiolo (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am Elizabeth's content manager and work directly for her which includes creating her Wikipedia content. Mrblieu2011 (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case you should read Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest to see how to properly disclose your conflict of interest. When uploading the images, I believe you were given the option to say this is someone else's work and you instead said this was your own work. Your best option now is probably to delete the images and re-upload them with the correct data. I can assist in deleting the images if you want. --Un assiolo (talk) 00:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello Mrblieu2011. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Paige Bradley, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mrblieu2011. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mrblieu2011|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DanCherek (talk) 04:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dan - I do assist Paige Bradley with updates, but not in a paid capacity. Thank you for checking. Mrblieu2011 (talk) 18:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Mrblieu2011. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Elizabeth Barlow (artist), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mrblieu2011. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mrblieu2011|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Netherzone (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Barlow (artist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Elizabeth Barlow (artist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it lacks citations (footnotes) and may contain unverified information about a living person, as well as original research based on personal knowledge rather than reliable secondary sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cielquiparle (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Barlow (artist) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the claims in the article are completely unsourced. The three existing sources are primary sources, what is needed are secondary sources that are fully independent of the person. There is a long list of External links, there should only be a couple (2 or 3). If any of these are reviews of her work, they should be converted to properly formatted citations. Additionally, the first three paragraphs in the "work" section are written in an unencyclopedic tone; it seems this is either original research or was written by the artist themself. Please fix these before resubmitting. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Barlow (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrblieu2011! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]