User talk:Mrradmand

Mrradmand, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mrradmand! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrradmand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new in Wikipedia and it's been 5 months that I have started to edit some articles and at the very first I thought I have break a law such as copyright or something, but it looks like you have listed my account as a fake one which is a little confusing to me. As I am unfamiliar with Wikipedia's rules please tell me if I can do something such as providing documents to prove my identity. Breaking law is somthing more acceptable to me as I am new here but fake ID is something that I really don't want to be accused for. Thanks Mrradmand (talk) 06:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the technical and behavioural overlap between this account and MrInfo2012. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if there is anything but the Mr in these two account. If there is a possibility let me know if I have done something to help this account. I am not familiar with all Wikipedia rules but as I have read I haven't break a law specially to support or attack another account. If there is a posibility to help me in this case, please do. Because I guarantee that I haven't support anyone on purpose.Mrradmand (talk) 06:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrradmand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please let me know if there is anything but the Mr in these two account. If there is a possibility let me know if I have done something to help this account. I am not familiar with all Wikipedia rules but as I have read I haven't break a law specially to support or attack another account. If there is a posibility to help me in this case, please do. Because I guarantee that I haven't support anyone on purpose.Mrradmand (talk) 4:02 am, 15 March 2021, Monday (1 month, 7 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.