User talk:Nasir 07

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Muhammad Ilyas Qadri was changed by Nasir 07 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931076 on 2011-10-17T11:21:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Numerous problems. There is not a proper lead - see WP:LEAD. We do not use honorifics such as PBUH, etc, see MOS:ISLAM. It looks as though you have copied text directly which is a copyright violation. I'm not convinced that your source meets our criteria at WP:RS although the website is used already in the article. The article is now unreadable because of the huge mass of text with no paragraph breaks and the use of non-English scripts plus a language I don't recognise and Google can't translate, is it Malay? Oops, I am wrong about the source, it no longer has any references at all. And it does not seem to be written from a neutral point of view, see WP:NPOV. It no longer uses the same name for the subject as the title. Dougweller (talk) 06:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Muhammad Ilyas Qadri. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

See WP:COI and please do not add material based on the Dawat-e-Islami site to articles. Instead, suggest their use on the article's talk page. Dougweller (talk) 15:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments and serious concerns about your editing.

Please read and follow the guideline at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles and do not add honorifics to articles.

DO NOT change what other editors have written on talk pages. If you continue to do so you will be blocked.

DO NOT use other accounts to edit. You may well be blocked today for doing this.

Please reply showing that you agree to the above. Your use of other accounts suggests that you are not here to improve the encyclopedia but to push your website and your point of view. Dougweller (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 16:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]