User talk:Nathanbobby

Welcome!

Hello, Nathanbobby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Emmerdale Regular Cast, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Harry the Dog WOOF 10:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emmerdale Regular Cast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nancy Hayton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| husband = [[Jake Dean]] (2008) <br>[[Darren Osborne.-->, 2012 - 13, 2014–)
character as "cool and independent and a total mess".<ref name=holysoap>{{cite web|title=Holy Soap > Hollyoaks > Cast > Nancy Hayton|url=http://holysoap.five.tv/hollyoaks/cast/nancy-hayton-9506|work=[[Holy Soap]]|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Janine Butcher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|portrayer =Rebecca Michael (1989–93)<br />Alexia Demetriou (1993–96)<br />[[Charlie Brooks]] (1999–2014######0

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced changes

Hello Nathanbobby. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, some of your changes have been reverted because you have not supplied references to support them. It is very important that articles be properly sourced. All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Webster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Graeme Proctor, you may be blocked from editing. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Fowler (EastEnders). Please also stop filling in last dates for characters that haven't left. This is only filled in once they have left. Ian Beale hasn't left. 5 albert square (talk) 17:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for addition if unsourced material/original research despite requests to stop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Edits

Hi

Just FYI breaks under one calendar year are not counted. Please stop adding these. Thanks 5 albert square (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Sally Webster, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 00:10, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]