User talk:Neckhumbucker
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Radio insect records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ozan Boz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ozan Boz[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ozan Boz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 17:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:C9AC:A0C:6F13:582C (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Neckhumbucker. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:C9AC:A0C:6F13:582C (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- After reading your comments on the article’s edit history and deletion discussion, I am quite sure you won’t believe me but I just saw this message. Message about COI in my inbox doesn’t take me here. Maybe it’s a bug, I don’t know. After COI was placed on the article, I kept looking at the talk page for the article for a discussion. And in the deletion discussion of the article I asked for more details as COI is very broad. I also reached out to a couple of editors for help on how to respond to COI, but no response so far. So much for the community spirit. Anyways…
- I've read conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide [[1]] among others. Guidelines assume once COI is placed the editor must have a COI, and guide the editor for what not to do. It is quite bizarre. I couldn't find anything on responding to a COI claim that the editor doesn’t accept.
- I just discovered the TeaHouse. So I’ll also ask for help there.
- In the meantime, for what it’s worth, I will leave a statement here and hope that it will help: I am not in any way affiliated with the persons in my articles, nor did I receive any remuneration for writing the articles.
- Anyone who feels the need to respond to this message, I kindly ask you to keep good faith.
- Neckhumbucker (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozan Boz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ϢereSpielChequers 23:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Re your undeletion request[edit]
Hello, I have asked for the draft I created to be deleted, per your request. If you have any other questions/concerns, please let me know. Cheers 13:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
This is very disappointing. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)