User talk:Nenefun4534

Welcome!

Hello, Nenefun4534, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gabey and Nikki Two Deaths, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabey and Nikki Two Deaths

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gabey and Nikki Two Deaths, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander Shadwick

Hello Nenefun4534,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alexander Shadwick for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xevus11 (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SevenWowzerfyingGirls

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SevenWowzerfyingGirls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RES2773 (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mario Kart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mario Kart was changed by Nenefun4534 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977941 on 2017-05-21T20:55:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RES2773 (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 21:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nenefun4534 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make improvements to certain articles and will no longer vandalize Wikipedia. I understand that I will not do it again.

Decline reason:

Given the problems you caused, that's not enough. What articles will you improve? How? How were your past contributions inappropriate? Huon (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nenefun4534 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will improve articles about radio stations. My past edits were inappropriate because I created pages that don't need to be on Wikipedia. And, I replaced articles with random content and added unnecessary content to articles. Nenefun4534 (talk) 18:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This is your WP:LASTCHANCE. Do not blow it. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Widr: Do you approve WP:ROPE unblock? Vanjagenije (talk) 07:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we can try that. Widr (talk) 07:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KJEL

Hello, Nenefun4534. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, KJEL, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Chris Troutman (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KJEL for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KJEL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KJEL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]