User talk:Niro5

This user participates in
WikiProject Biography.

Welcome

Hello, Niro5, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 04:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Syracuse

I agree with you completely, but just get ready for a barrage of attacks. AdamBiswanger1 18:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Countless objective arguments"? At least you should doubt that Google is an "objective" argument to stress importance of an entry: my idea is that we are writing a Bold textcultural encyclopedia, not an Internet service... Maybe you could disagree, but at least try to have a broader point of view on the thing. See you soon!--Attilios 20:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is of course reasonable, but I must disagree. now I'll enter in philosophy: you will never convince me that the knowledge of Syracuse, NY, Jeopardy! or Michael Jackson will make people better that a visit to Syracuse, Italy. This is the way in which I see culture: something that can make people better and improve their felicity. Personally, I think that if a proportion should be here, the sole Main sights section of Syracuse, Italy should be longer than the whole Syracuse, New York. But this of course is my opinion. It's also the same opinion of the Britannica editors, and Britannica's is a respectable point of view for me in building an encyclopedia. But it seems that our opinion of what must be this encyclopedia diverge a bit. What helps me is that currently opposers are a minority in the poll... Bye!! --Attilios 21:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC) (P.S.: Syracuse was probably more "important" than Thebes...)[reply]

The former is partly serious, partly a joke. Frankly speaking, if you had a relative asking you an advice for a trip, you'd really advice him Syracuse, NY? I'm totally not convinced by your arguments. I disagree with the "intelligenzia" definition and the idea of the Google "mass" having to be respected. I'm sure you're here 'case: 1) you have fun writing an encyclopedia; 2) you want to do the best work you can. What's the role of the "mass" in all this? I repeat it, the Internet mass uses it mainly for pornography. I like Wikipedia for it has no bias, and also some info on pornography is welcome, but let's remain serious, please. now, to speak frankly, your replies are starting to look sophistic: first we agree to have a poll, and then when the poll is against you you say that "democracy has killed Socrates and elected Hitler". Sorry, but this is the typical argument of the ones who, when they see themselves losing, go against the rules (Silvio Berlusconi is Nr. 1 in this). I wrote a lot of times that Googles is probably not the most correct judge to validate an entry's "importance", but you and other "syracusans" never tried to argument this. I said that Michael Jackson has more Googles entries than Syracuse or even Taj Mahal, and... someone replied that the comparison must be done instead with less important Michael Jacksons: I wrote that to point out the unrelevance of Googles, and my argument was skillfully diverted to favour your opinion. This looks at me as the work a lawyer defending a guilt man (John Grisham is famous also here in Italy, eh eh!). All this, written in the utmost respect for your ideas, of course. But also convinced that they are wrong, eh eh. Again frankly speaking, all this discussion has no importance for me: it's simply interesting to see how "campanilistic" (do you have this word in English?) can be intelligent people in things they are fond of. Ciao! --Attilios 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ah! If you are not already a lawyer, you should soon start to study to become one of them. I try to be objective, and declaring that a 300,000/1,000,000 US city is not notable would be not intelligent. But this does not mean that it is equally notable that Syracuse, Italy (at least in my view). Ciao!--Attilios 22:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again you made me laugh. No, I'll never cease from the idea that S,IT must be placed in Syracuse. If one day one Michael Jackson should made the record of home runs in the Idaho league, growing to "notable" status too, this will mean that Michael Jackson the singer should be moved to Michael Jackson (singer) or maybe Michael Jackson (pedophile)? But this will not forbid they both both will be present in Michael Jackson (disambiguation)... I seem we never talk to abolish Syracuse (disambiguation), didn't we? Ciao and greetings to Aunt Millie. --Attilios 23:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hurry, before they notice

"Siracusa", as it is spelled, is actually the #1 search result for the italian google. You could get torn apart on that one if they see it. AdamBiswanger1 19:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

small world indeed

There is a lot of Washington DC stuff needed for articles that I have in mind or have already worked on so just keep working away at those Circles and what ever else catches your eye. I have a lot of D.C. content and photographs already on wikipedia, but there is a lot there and it is a long way from Dixon NM. Carptrash 14:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boot Village

No worries... to be truthful, I barely remembered that article. I think I just stub sorted it into.. Cambria locations... V. Joe 17:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how to get in touch with you

Each time I put something up about any of the cooperative businesses in town it gets taken down. I imagine it is because it seems to be an ad, yet P&C and Brugers stay up all over the Syracuse site. The Syracuse Real Food Co-op and the Cooperative Credit union are owned by the community and have been for years. Why do these keep coming down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KVenneSyr (talk • contribs)

I'll respond to this on this user's talk page. -newkai t-c 17:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check User talk:KVenneSyr about KvenneSyr's co-op ambitions. I really don't know how we should proceed in regards to businesses in articles. -newkai t-c 23:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trip to the Met

How did your trip to the Met go? Did you get some good shots of PD art?--ragesoss 02:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Washington, D.C. (southeast); Southeastern University; Circumscribed circle; U Street Corridor; Burleith; Circle Line (New York); Washington, D.C. (northeast); Dupont Circle (Washington Metro); Shepherd Park; Tenleytown; Florida Avenue (Washington, D.C.); Petworth, Washington, D.C.; Hains Point; Wesley Heights; Abraham Cahan; Grand Palais; Lushan; Michael Sheridan; Shops at Columbus Circle

Cleanup: Interstate 215 (Nevada); Heterophobia; U.S. Route 50
Merge: List of neighborhoods of the District of Columbia by ward; Monument Circle, Indianapolis; Qutb complex
Add Sources: Circle hand game; Circle Line Party; Geoffrey Durham
Wikify: Drum circle; Jillian Armenante; Niña
Expand: Dot-com bubble; Red Rooster; Pygmy

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

Got it now. Good joke, I agree, a little nip would have made for a more satisfactory rebellion ;)Wikipediarul e s 2221 03:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khar nuur

Khar Nuur article text relates to Khar Nuur (1132 m above see level)in Их Нууруудын Хотгор (Great Lakes Basin), but space image is made of the other Khar Nuur (1196 m above) in Khangai mountains. Of course sweet water see (5000 year ago) couldn't reach almost 2000 m level (over 800 m more than it's present relicts). And article author confuses Их Нууруудын Хотгор (Great Lakes Basin), where Khar nuur is present, and Нууруудын Хθндий (Lakes Walley), where is no any Khar nuur. Please, check your article. I think, you are not correct in geographic locations. Frequent Mongolian names Khar nuur (Black lake), Tsagaan nuur (White lake) etc. are confusing Bogomolov.PL 12:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Hamilton College (Scotland)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hamilton College (Scotland), by Thewinchester, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hamilton College (Scotland) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hamilton College (Scotland), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Hamilton College (Scotland) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Syracuse revived

Hi Niro5 -- Just a note to claim that Wikipedia:WikiProject Syracuse, New York is at least somewhat revived, with a couple people contributing and a good number of new articles. See the new article list on the main webpage of the project. Hope you can return and participate! doncram (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Philip Sheridan Statue.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Philip Sheridan Statue.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |EPO| ^da: 13:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Pana Banaue Rice Terraces.JPG

File:Pana Banaue Rice Terraces.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pana Banaue Rice Terraces.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pana Banaue Rice Terraces.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armen Boladian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armen Boladian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armen Boladian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:69th regiment armory.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:69th regiment armory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tiamat's Wrath moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tiamat's Wrath, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garfield Circle

The article Garfield Circle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Article has been in CAT:NN for almost 11 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 19:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randle Circle

The article Randle Circle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 19:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pinehurst Circle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinehurst Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinehurst Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sounder Bruce 08:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of circles in Washington, D.C.

The article List of circles in Washington, D.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I spotted this at Wikipediocracy's "Cr#p Articles" list. One local source doesn't make the topic notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 14.202.98.110 (talk) 05:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]