User talk:Nowhere77/Archives/2015/August

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mercury Villager may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] plant in [[Avon Lake, Ohio]]. It was Mercury's first of only two minivan models it ever featured (before the [[Mercury Monterey (minivan)|2004-07 Mercury Monterey]]. In spite of Mercury's tradition

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Running Man Barnstar
		For your great contribution to football related articles FkpCascais (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on middle-distance runners – there are many athletes with interesting stories that barely get covered at all! SFB 19:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Order of contents

Hi there ZASTAVAFAN, AL "here",

please keep in mind that, in some cases, personal life of a footballer does not have anything to do with football. So, it should be the very last thing on the list of contents, the football things coming first of course.

Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience (for example any exaggeration on my edit summary). --AL (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

• No re-reply, seems you did take offense at my reversion/summary, apologize once again but can't be doing it all the time as you may imagine. What i can and will do is propose a discussion at WP:FOOTY, whatever results emerge from there i will abide by.

Cheers --AL (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

• Done so (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Order_of_contents), please leave your opinion if you like. --AL (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

If you notice the last opinion, it states "Where the subject's personal life goes is dependent on the person. Our suggested layout works best for persons who are famous primarily or exclusively for their football careers. My preference in this case is for an "early life" section before the football stuff, and a "personal life" section before the stats blocks." So, as we stand, Bruma's article is not wrong, and i've complied with the fact that honours should come after statistics.

That said, if you want to continue unresponsive there's nothing i can do about it, i apologized (here i go again!) for anything that might have been viewed as a "wrongdoing in words", and am trying my best. Take care --AL (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page suggests that you have completely ignored the advice from User:Always Learning and the suggestions at WT:FOOTY. The order of the sections at Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Zinedine Zidane is pretty irrelevant to the situation at Wayne Rooney, but thank you for informing me of the incorrect order in those articles. – PeeJay 22:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Re:How do I do this on my userpage?

The code looks fine (of course it does :) ), but the subpage does not exist yet. Once you create it an copy the barnstars, it should work... GregorB (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Should be fine now. I needed to purge the page (WP:PURGE). GregorB (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Miloš Krstić. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 17:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, most of your edits were fine, with references supporting what you said - though you did introduce un-encyclopedic material (the section about the free kick), POV (i.e. describing a club as "ambitious"), as well as unreferenced information (i.e. the Thun stats, which I have since corrected). Because it is such a short article, I don't think headers bring anything to it but if you wish to re-introduce them I won't challenge you. We should be able to work together to make this a better article/encyclopedia. GiantSnowman 18:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Yep, go ahead for the headings. As for the free kick, again that is your personal view that it was an important goal, or an important match. It does not appear to have been covered in any reliable, third-party sources. If you are able to find sources which cover the goal in detail then we could consider adding a small section back. GiantSnowman 18:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I have removed the maintenance tags; many thanks for adding the new references. GiantSnowman 12:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Kolarov Image

My mistake on the year difference. I still think the headshot/quality are better enough, however, to merit that image being the lede. Out of curiosity, how do you know it is copyrighted? It says "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license." I don't have too much knowledge of that. User:Gossamers User talk:Gossamers 3 October 17:55 (ET)

A page you started (2015 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2015 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships, Zastavafan76!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your GA nomination of Serbia–United States relations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Serbia–United States relations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serbia–United States relations

The article Serbia–United States relations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Serbia–United States relations for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar for You!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Serbia–United States relations to Good Article status.  — Calvin999 10:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For an excellent job on Serbia-U.S. relations, an important article. BlueSalix (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nowhere77. You have new messages at Talk:Serbia–United States relations/GA1.
Message added 17:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Just letting you know that there is three days left of the seven days I've given you to address my comments on your Good Article nomination for Serbia-United States relations.  — Calvin999 17:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nowhere77. You have new messages at Talk:Serbia–United States relations/GA1.
Message added 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've responded to your question about dates.  — Calvin999 22:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serbia–United States relations

The article Serbia–United States relations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Serbia–United States relations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

History of FK Vojvodina

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of FK Vojvodina, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp5MMIRASVk.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)