User talk:Nstrainman1006

Welcome

Hello, Nstrainman1006, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Whpq (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: NS O Line (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

An independent source is needed to explain that the rail line is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NS O Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nstrainman1006, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Norfolk Southern L Line and O Line name problems

The L Line and O Line are not the correct names of these two rail lines. I can tell they are nicknames, but they are not the actual names of these two rail lines. If it were the actual names of these two rail lines, the names would show on employee timetables and track charts, but it doesn't. I will try to find the correct names of these two rail lines.

Tip for creating an article, instead of submitting an article for review, just post it on Wikipedia and see how it turn out.Granthew (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the timetables and saw the L Line and O Line names, I missed it because it was deep in the employee timetables, now the question is are they actually considered rail lines or parts of a rail line. Example- the Nicholson Cutoff in PA was built as a rail line, but it is now part of a rail line, it is part of the Sunbury Line rail line. Granthew (talk) 07:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:NS O Line concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NS O Line, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NS O Line

Hello, Nstrainman1006. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NS O Line".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GMSR 1711 at Night.jpg

The file File:GMSR 1711 at Night.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

blurry photo, unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]