User talk:OneHarlequinade

This is OneHarlequinade's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Hampshire Cultural Trust, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please work on the existing draft rather than submitting it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SophAdders/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SophAdders/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SophAdders, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this article back to Draft. Please work on it from there. Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hampshire Cultural Trust (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Article needs more statements about the organization's background. Who created the trust and who are its investors? How was it able to acquire and fund all these museums? The specific programs should be combined into one section and sourced by third-party sources. If you've noticed I've added local newspaper coverage for the various venue lists so that should replace some of the primaries. Also see the news articles on the talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Allen Gallery (2) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Allen Gallery (2). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hampshire Cultural Trust. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Allen Gallery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Allen Gallery. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Willis Museum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Willis Museum. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willis Museum has been accepted

Willis Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hampshire

Hi SophAdders, I just wanted to drop by to say thank you for joining WikiProject Hampshire recently and to welcome you to the project. We're one of the smallest and least-busy WikiProjects around at the moment but I'm trying to stoke some more life into it, to encourage more collaboration on Hampshire related articles. Do drop a message on the project talk page if there's something you'd like the project to work on together, and if I can help at all feel free to contact me on my own user talk page. Happy editing! Waggers TALK 13:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashcroft Arts Centre has been accepted

Ashcroft Arts Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TeaDrinker (talk) 12:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Gallery (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources do not establish WP:CORPDEPTH

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allen Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allen Gallery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]