User talk:Orangekubrick

Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~

Since your article had got to "External links", it was reasonable to assume it had finished. I deleted it because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines, and was generally pretty spammy, with the content being geared to what you can buy, with little biography. Jimfbleak 16:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought that if he was notable, there would be more info out there. If you want to recreate the article, I won't delete again, but obviously another admin might. Jimfbleak 05:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was checking radiohead's b-sides. and, could you be kind enough to put those that are missing from the list. 'cause there are. the songs from the demo and the first 2 eps are not listed and possibly other songs are to! (24.232.155.29 (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Re: Alberto Balsalm

Hi. I had nothing to do with the deletion of Alberto Balsalm. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, you weren't talking about Alberto Balsalm, you were talking about Alberto Balsalm (song). It was deleted as a broken redirect. The page had been moved to Alberto Balsalm. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pliskin (musician)

A tag has been placed on Pliskin (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Teenage Bad Girl

A tag has been placed on Teenage Bad Girl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 11:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Radiohead B-sides

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Radiohead B-sides, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Radiohead B-sides. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 19:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lemongrass (Musician)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lemongrass (Musician), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.discogs.com/artist/Lemongrass. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lemongrass (Musician)

A tag has been placed on Lemongrass (Musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ease Up for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ease Up is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ease Up until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aphex Twin songs has been nominated for renaming

Category:Aphex Twin songs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Popcornfud (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted A. Bohus

The article Ted A. Bohus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has had some success, but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]