User talk:Osmo.Daniele
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Repercussions (band).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 13:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Osmo.Daniele, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Keep Reachin Up, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the reference. For future edits, try using the cite web template (or cite journal, news, etc., depending on source) to cite the source, like here. Dan56 (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Repercussions (band).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 21:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Osmo.Daniele, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Osmo.Daniele! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
RE: Repurcussions
[edit]What does this article have to do with me? If you're asking in general about editing articles and verification, then "personal experience" is never acceptable; only published sources. The only published sources are not online; there are several ways of citing different sources, such as newspapers, magazines, Template:Cite press release, etc. If none exist, then it is likely not notable enough to have its own article (Wikipedia:Notability). This policy prevents indiscriminate information from being included, which is the same standards actual, print encyclopedias follow. After all, there is no infinitely comprehensive, all knowing enyclopedia.
I checked out Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Repercussions (band), and the problem is that the sources as listed in a separate section. Each line of prose needs a footnote, like, using your Allmusic source:
<ref name="Bush">{{cite web|last=Bush|first=John|url=http://www.allmusic.com/artist/repercussions-mn0000390919|title=Repercussions - Music Biography, Credits and Discography|publisher=[[Allmusic]]. [[Rovi Corporation]]|accessdate=2012-08-31}}</ref>
They cant just be listed like it is there and the above content be synthesized together, otherwise anyone has the right to remove uncited prose on grounds that it is not verified by a source. If there are adequate sources for this article, then try reviewing WP:Citing sources for guidelines on adequately citing those sources. Since the band has its own Allmusic entry, then I'd say it atleast should be mentioned at Nicole Willis if not its own article. Also, Discogs is not reliable source, it's a self-published source comprised of user-generated content; I could have signed up to the site and made entries. However, it is a useful guide in looking up credits and catalogue #s for releases, which should then be appropriately cited with what those users generating the content likely used, album notes or release notes. I would also recommend searching "Repurcussions Nicole Willis" or something in that vein through GoogleBooks (you can cite a book with Template:Cite book) or GoogleNews (archive search), which are good for older subjects. Dan56 (talk) 08:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Timmion Records for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timmion Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timmion Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Repercussions (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Repercussions (band)
[edit]
Hello Osmo.Daniele. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Repercussions (band).
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Repercussions (band)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)