User talk:Pajagonde
Pajagonde, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi Pajagonde!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
July 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm Agtx. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anti-Pakistan sentiment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. agtx 22:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Other Practiced Religion: [[Hinduism]]<br>[[Buddhism]]<br>[[Christianism]]}}
- }}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Buudy bangladesh has other religions practiced so im just putting them on they are also recognized i think
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Infobox country
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Anti-Indian sentiment without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC) i removed it because its not true razakars dont exist in bangladesh anymore and bangladesh is quite fine right now
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-Indian sentiment with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Khaleda Zia, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: 2 edits. If you have a problem with content in an article and you elect to remove it, you need to explain why. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:50, 9 August 2015 (UTC) yes sorry actually khaleda zia became prime minister only twice
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Telfordbuck (talk) 19:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC) I just added something that is true
September 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Infobox country
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC) im sorry for that actually i got a good source of it
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Infobox country
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Genocides in history with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I think this is a false accusations
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genocides in history with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Genocides in history, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Pajagonde. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)