User talk:Paulley/Archive 3

Andy Boy Simmonz

You reverted my edit on andy Boy and said he was in the first 1PW match. If you mean the proving ground battle royal then I cant find any evidence of this. Can you provide proof that he was there? darkie

Ignore me, I asked him myself. He was in the PG match so the 1PW guy who told me otherwise was a prat! It was however a one off until he was hired several months down the line. darkie

Hi

No i dont think we ever have spoken or introduced ourselfs, so anyways, Hi, my real name is Carlyn, i've seen many of your edits around here and i would like to say you do a great job. i did leave this before in the archive 2 part but after i posted it i wasn't sure if it was in the right place so ive deleted that oen and posted it here, sorry about that(Lil crazy thing 10:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks!

I'm running around like a chicken with it's head cutoff trying to fix articles that User:BooyakaDell is tagging (I'm in a RfC with/against him), and it's appreciated.. He doesn't seem to want to help fix articles, just point out they are problems... SirFozzie 19:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition

Hi. You probably have no idea who I am, but I contacted you a while ago to say thanks. From what I gather you have a good taste in music, and I am sure I've seen you on WP:Pro Wrestling. Is there any chance of collaborating and starting a Wikiproject about the music of wrestling (PPV themes, WWE e music of this great business. It will be Wikipedia:WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Moe

Hello Paulley, just thought I would let you know that I was leaving Wikipedia, but before I left, I finally got a picture of thyself onto Wikipedia. (I know great timing for me to post a picture of myself, right?) This is my final gift to my friends. Later! PS. Try not to laugh to hard at my ugly mug ok? Moe ε 16:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol, cya... have fun in what ever you get upto --- Paulley 18:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Grimes

Messsage from JB196: Yes, I do know a decent amount about Vic, he is a friend of mine and I have over 100 results from his matches dating back to 1996. I'll add some info to his profile later this week.

Message from JB196: I added a move list for Vic. I'll work on a career summary in the next week.

Message from JB196: Well, in all fairness, while the edits are tracked, they're tracked all the way from the beginning so someone might have to go thru 3 pages of the Edit History to see who edited what. Also, on your profile page, you have a whole list of profiles you made, so like me, you do take credit for the stuff you do. Sure there is a subtle difference but in the end it shows that both of us in some way want it to be shown that work in question was ours. I made a references section; I hope that is more reasonable. If my name is not going to be included somewhere in that Grimes' profile then I don't want that movelist on there. Also added his senton variations as those are two of his main moves that have really made him who he is...to make space for them I took out some of the more common moves he uses.

Nikita

Now that's something to be happy about! (Fr3nZi3 04:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Melina

Melina is moving to RAW whooooooooooh! And the new WWE Women's Champion....Melina!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks!

I have created the Queens_of_chaos page. Thanks for the editing ! Moreover, I think I made a mistake with the creation of the Queens of Chaos page ! Is it possible to erase the Queens of Chaos page ? Sorry I am not a professionnal of Wikipedia :)

Please don't post "hidden spoilers'

They are still considered spoilers and are no help, although if you do see un-aired spoilers please revert them or erase them.--Trick man01 04:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Bob Orton Jr. and Randy Orton

Can you please try and sort this out i have tried to tell User talk:DaffyDuck619 to add a citation that isn't from imdb because there has been many untrue things on that website on the ortons pages and to cite and interview or article which he will not do. I have a very strong knowledge of the ortons and contact with one of them so i know the information this user keeps adding isn't true. Also this user has a history of adding untrue things to the ortons pages as he keep adding that barry o's son wanted to be a wrestler saying that randy and bob said it in an interview (just like his now adding bob's other son wants to be) when that was untrue as barry doesnt have a son but the user still kept adding it for a little abit a while back. Please could you try to talk to him as his also insulted me in an edit summary which is not the first time he has done that to someone his also made false threats in edit summaries before saying he will block someone if they remove his information which he does not have the ability to do. Thank you for any help. Lil crazy thing 12:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestler measurements for UK

Hiya Paulley, what do you think aboot putting the imperial measurements first on UK wrestlers pages? What would you have first? I know the UK is officially a metric nation now, but metric is not what the country think in and most wouldn't have a clue how tall they are in cm. Plus from what user JFred says Canada is also a metric nation, yet they have imperial first for Canadian wrestlers. I am looking for consistency here. And would appreciate your thoughts. I asked McPhail for any British editors and he directed me here.(Halbared 07:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I am going thru Wiki adding the metric for all wrestlers I find that don't have it. I just think it looks weird for UK wrestlers who get famous in the US to have metric first. In Canada, the US and the UK people know their wreslters in imperial. Unlike other nations, also metric is the official system of Canada, so I suppose I am looking for consistency. I have been uniforming all the heights and weights I come across. If Finlay is only known in the UK and the US (which he is now, he is an old wrestler from the world of sport days), then shouldn't his bio have Imperial first? This is the policy for Canada, who is in the same situation as us.(Halbared 07:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the response! I don't intend to wipe metric off the board, and I have spent quite some time adding metric to may wreslters bio's. I just think that the stats should reflect the practical situation of each nation, as well as non-uniformity and inconsistency looking sloppy, which is not what wiki is aboot;o).(Halbared 17:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Bobby Lashley

Why did you delete the title box for Bobby Lashley? That is how it's supposed to be for wrestlers so I don't see the point in you deleting it. TJ Spyke 22:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

Hey, there's a vote up in: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#UK measurements. Could you cast your vote?
↪Lakes (Talk) 08:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:DaffyDuck619

Could you please say something to this user, his just does not give it a rest on the nathan orton stuff, he still keeps adding it and i have told him time and time again unless he can state a source else other then imdb then dont add it i think thats pretty fair, but he doesnt listen to a single word and it's getting very annoying now. The fact i'm the one that gets the blame is unfair when other users have removed it aswell not just me because that ifnormation isn't need plus theres been so many untrue thigns added to the orton's pages on imdb that i tend to not believe anything from there unless cited else where. Others have agreed with me on this, the bob orton page has been locked because of him wanting the nathan bit it in and he did like it when someone else told him. People can you do something. Lil crazy thing 14:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean ups

Hey Paulley try to clean up Torrie Wilson's profile under the subsection Feud with Candice Michelle it has a lot of week-by-week stuff --- User:JustMaria 3:43; 13 June 2006 (UTC)

That looks much better -- User:JustMaria 11:14 ; 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey can u also clean up Cherry or Miss Kara SLice profile, it looks messy - User:JustMaria 1:30 ; 14 June 2006 (UTC)

On WWE Fantasy

Heya, just to say something in my defense. I am of the opinion that the Finishing moves list the folks on WWE.com maintain is probably one of the most credible sources out there, other then the wrestlers themselves.

http://www.wwe.com/play/fantasy/scoringquestions/signaturescoringquestions1

Just checking, I think you do know what WWE Fantasy is all about, right? :)

Some random arsehole

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=165.196.194.167

This person is trying to intimidate other editors and warn that he/she will report anyone who tries to edit, specifically, the signature moveset of particular wrestlers for 'vandalism'. What do you think?

Brainbuster#Argentine brainbuster

Isn't this the same move as a Facebuster#Argentine facebuster with the only variable being how the opponent takes the bump? --- Lid 14:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Championship format

Hey Paulley. I was wondering if it was alright to change the formats of the Championship succession on articles. I am willing to make the appropriate changes like on the John Cena article I did. Let me know.. — The King of Kings 19:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll get on it and I'll watch for people changing it. :-) Oh, and thanks for the welcome back. (It seems like a long time ago I left, but I just saw my picture above this comment :-D) — The King of Kings 20:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Moe looks at Ric Flair's championships and accomplishments* Ugh, I guess I'll be here a while.. — The King of Kings 21:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a query

Can you make heads or tails of this Professional wrestling holds#Reverse cloverleaf? The writing is just awful and i'm not sure how to fix the move because I can't find a coherent definition anywhere and the current description gives me no idea. --- Lid 11:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I initially thought it was fake too, but it's listed as the finisher of Puma so I have no idea. --- Lid 14:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found this video on a website next to Puma labelled Kansas City Missouri Cloverleaf, which is probably the same move as the Figure Four Deathlock only renamed http://www.wrestlingencyclopedia.com/Moves3/KansasCityMissouriCloverleaf.wmv --- Lid 14:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Figured out the modificiation: rather than locking both legs under his arm he locks one leg behind his knee and the other under his arm forming a figure four. Watching in frames it seems he crosses one leg over the opponents other leg and then locks it behind his knee before turning the opponent over. --- Lid 14:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: over, not under, it becomes under when it gets turned over. --- Lid 14:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you say

Ok, but he has a bald head that closley resembles D-von. Torax2 18:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania X8

Could you please help summarize this [1]? I keep telling him it's full of grammar errors, weasel words, and peacock terms, yet he still keeps adding it. If you could help me summarize the match to be consistent with other matches in the article I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.--3bulletproof16 21:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TheTruth2 has been reported. If you would like to leave a comment concerning the situation please do so here. I find it strange that when he is referred to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling show formatting or any other guideline for that matter, he claims that he has already read them and that his edits "still follows the guidelines". Signed up just 3 days ago... Yep TJ Spyke and I are dealing with a troll here.--3bulletproof16 22:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RQW Article

I am disgraced with what I have seen many people like me and others work very hard on making the RQW Article really good but all you do is delete it. Why should there be a bloody 'edit page' button at the top of each article when all you do is delete every bit of information that I put down. I am furious and so is the RQW forum and Len Davies (Co-Owner) for what you do. I want to partcipate and make the RQW artcile look good but I can't when you delete everything I put down. Its news and thats what people need to know what is happening around RQW but not many people know stuff like this because you delete it all. I am not given you any information with what has happened with Erin Angel and Phil Powers. All I want you to do is rather than deleting all the information I put down just change it because I work on this article at least 2 and a half hours a day making it look good. So stuff you and plaease don't delete everything people put down. User_talk:Samgibbs.

?

How did you know I was the one that made that edit anyway? Torax2 15:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh

Ah, thanks. Torax2 00:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Format

OK, I'm ignorant here, what formating changes?(Halbared 21:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

As you posted this the first time

Your input would be greatly appreciated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#User:JB196. --- Lid 09:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I could use your input at the Vic Grimes page (see the history page as to why). I'm half tempted to add my name to the CM Punk page in protest and claim the same argument. --- Lid 15:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And another one: Texas Wrestling Academy (check history) --- Lid 01:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You've been here much longer than me, so I won't be ignorant and fight you on the change, But on Bob Holly's page is the subtitle "Water-Wheel Slam" if the move is officially called the Alabamba Slam? Cheers, Dubbya9 00:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...? Cheers, Dubbya9 01:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Japanese armdrag

I'm sorry you've completely lost me, Japanese armdrag? --- Lid 01:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --- Lid 02:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SheamusO'Shaunessy2ndAugust.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SheamusO'Shaunessy2ndAugust.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worried, it seems the article already has a suitable pic so if this is deleted it wouldnt matter much --- Paulley

Help with a article

Hi Paulley, Sorry if I have been lary. I really am sorry but I have been needing your help for this artcile I have done. They say they arw going to delete it. It is a article on a female british wrestler Skye. The article name is Skye (Wrestler). I would appreciate your help. Sam Gibbs

Signature moves

Well if you check your facts you will see that I did not delete any signature moves of Booker's all I did was simply put up the sunset flip from the corner as one of his finisher moves as he has done on many occasions. Now onto Batista, maybe he did use the strong clothesline at one point on RAW but he hasn't used it since his days as a Smackdown superstar, but I will not delete that one considering that he did do it, but when it comes to Jackhammer suplexes and full nelson slams--that is ridiculous. Batista doesnt use those moves, and once at Summerslam does not count! I will not delete the strong clothesline, but all the other rubbish needs to go. Thanks for your cooperation. --Fr3nZi3 22:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that is fine! It happens to the best of us! Once I accused someone of major vandalism and I got the wrong person. haha! But yeah, the generic moves needs to go, also from what I have seen of Batista so far he has not been using Jackhammer suplex and stuff, but hey Batista isn't dead, and neither has he retired--he is still wrestling and we can always add more signature moves as he establishes them. --Fr3nZi3 15:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado DDT

Sorry I forgot about the links--my bad. --Fr3nZi3 01:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Len Davies

Hi Paulley Can you see if this article is ok, if not can you make it better. I have put loads of work into it. As there is already a article named Len Davies I added something. You have to type Len Davies (RQW Owner) into the serach engine and it will come up. If you can change the title of that to something different then please do so. The artcile is really good so please can you help me to keep it. Thanks Sam!

Rob Van Dam#Wrestling facts

There is an argument over where to list Split-legged moonsault and I could use your aid. RVD used the split-legged moonsault as his finisher as Robbie V, in early ECW and during his time in the WWF during the mid 90s in the ECW invasion. The debate is should it be listed as a finisher, as it once was, or a signature move, as it now is? --- Lid 05:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Grimes

I just can't get through to user JB196. He continues to revert the article, reducing its quality claiming that he is not credited as "The Author" in the article itself. The issue is being brought up here [2] help would be greatly appreciated. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special K

Hey, I added some stuff to the Special K page. I'm not sure about the K Drop. I looked through the championships, and I'm not sure if they were known as Special K outside of ROH, so I kept ROH tag team championship and left the rest in hidden text in case you wanted to repost them. Also it seems like most of the reigns took place before Special K existed. Jonathan Burgess 07:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with User:Fr3nZi3

If you check the history of facebuster here you will see I am in a dispute with frenzie over listing Melina as she's not a populariser or innovater, she's just the most current user. When he rephrased that to high impact I removed it citing Homicide not being listed at Vertebreaker to which he replied with this. Can you help me to get him to understand? –– Lid^(Talk) 00:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i have noticed those edits but there isnt much we can do... except revert and try to get him to understand that adding notable users isnt a viable practice in these articles... thats why they were removed in the first place ---- Paulley 18:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but isn't someone who is a populariser a matter of opinion?? In my opinion, Melina is the most current user of the move, and she has popularized it, although it was used many years ago--but if you are to think of any wrestler who uses the spinning facebuster--Melina come to mind first. But considering that both of you have expressed your displeasure at me adding the move, I will not add it again. I hope we have come to a consensus. --Fr3nZi3 17:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Melina is a popularizer. Well if you havent noticed I am a huge Melina fan! And I watch all of her matches. She used this move a lot in OVW to finish matches and in the WWE she has used this move three times. Once on Christy Hemme on Smackdown to defeat her, twice on Trish Stratus (Survivor Series 2005 and Saturday Nights Main Event) and once on Jillian Hall (Judgment Day 2006)--when she hits it and the person kicks out after two, you usually hear her have a high pitched scream to show her frustration that the person kicked out of her move. So yeah she is a popularizer in my eyes, plus she is the only current user . And to be honest being a popularizer is a matter of opinion, but I am not going to go against the consensus, which distrupt the flow we have here on WP:PW! By the way I think she will be an excellent WWE Women's Champion! --Fr3nZi3 00:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need major help

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Professional_wrestling_double-team_maneuvers&curid=1452036&action=history

An IP user went through and greatly changed a lot of the article however a lot of the edits are valid so I'm having a difficult time seperating the good from the bad. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking we should just do a massive revert, there were too many changes made. –– Lid^(Talk) 00:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tag team infobox

Sure, I'll add one in now. --Oakster ^(Talk) 10:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Oakster ^(Talk) 10:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Konnan

Ok, I am really starting to loose my temper. Yesterday I tried to add the extended format of the championships and accomplishments to the John Cena article and I was reverted by Jtalledo stating that the format was to clunky and it was predetermined at WP:PW as consensus. Now, I change to correct the format on the Konnan article and I am reverted by you. Either you two make up your minds about which format you guys like, or I am not going to be as cool about next time. — Moe Epsilon 21:16 September 22 '06

Could discuss this with Jtalledo then? Because when I add this format, he reverts. And likewise when I take away the format, you revert. Its all very confusing :( — Moe Epsilon 21:29 September 22 '06

WP:PW

I tried to answer all your questions at WP:PW the best I could. Hopefully I did. :) — Moe Epsilon 21:06 October 02 '06

In response to the italics in the headings, I thought they looked nice. I can't say right now if we should implement it as a format, but maybe a future consensus reaching tally could be done so we can decide. :) — Moe Epsilon 01:47 October 04 '06

Your edit to WWE United States Championship

Thank you for experimenting with the page WWE United States Championship on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. TJ Spyke 22:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I forgot you are in the UK, I was wondering why you of all people would post SD results before they aired over here in North America. TJ Spyke 22:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

This is just a note to say that I'm ceasing to edit Wikipedia indefinitely, so good luck with the Pro Wrestling Wikiproject, and hopefully you can get a wrestling article made featured article sooner rather than later. Thanks. McPhail 20:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal???

KingOfDX 03:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes you reverted various good edits on the backbreaker page and readded a photo that has already been regarded unfit for the page --- Paulley

McPhail

Hey, do you know why McPahil is deciding to leave wiki? --Mikedk9109 (Sup) (stalk me) 00:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know. He's a good editor. I learned alot from him. --Mikedk9109 (sup) (stalk me) 23:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Steele

Nice work on Peter Sauer and Ray Steele (wrestler) articles :) Keresaspa 16:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not aproblem its what i do --- Paulley

Randy Orton

i saw you agree with me on the adding of cyber sunday to his page but yet there is editors that keep removing it saying its week by week, it is not of the sorts there is also an editor that is just following what the others are doing he does not know anything about wrestling. I find it very annoying that they want to keep the cyber sunday results of his page but yet on everyone else that was involved in cyber sunday its mentioned on theres. Thats not right allowing it for all the other pages and not his.

it may be the possibillity thats its not notable for Ortons page... it is however notable for DX as it was their undefeated streak that was broken... and maybe after the feud has ended it can e readded as part of a sigle paragraph depicting the feud --- Paulley 16:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)... most weekly results shouldnt be added[reply]

Congrats!

Congrats!

You have recently been added to my Respect List. Clay4president 20:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Double superkick.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Double superkick.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ----Robth^Talk 20:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NWA Virginia

I'm just wondering what criteria you based on editing this article? I modelled it after several I had seen concerning other NWA member promotions. Thanks.JeffCapo 22:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes but the information inclosed did not warrent so much division if the article was of healthy size then scuh divisions can be utilized --- Paulley

I was looking to expand the article to include more info, including the roster and other infoJeffCapo 14:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please do continue... just make sure what you write is kept neat and has no POV.. as wikipedia is not an advertising tool.. anyway im goin to go through one of the title pages to bring it up to standard and allow you to use it as a guide for the others. Anyway please continue on editing and good luck with the article --- Paulley

Thank you for your help. I'm endeavouring to keep within the Wikipedia rules & guidelinesJeffCapo 14:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, here is a cleanup title page for your NWA Virginia Tag Team Championship. please use this as a guidline for the other titles when you get some spar time --- Paulley

Wow! That's great! I really appreciate the guidance. JeffCapo 17:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up all the title pages using your template. Thanks again!!! JeffCapo 04:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool good work... i just went through and wrote the title introductions but i think i may need your help with the NWA Virginia Junior Heavyweight Championship... i see it doesnt have the pre Virginia title history and their are a few title changes that i dont understad namely "Vindicator" Mike Vaughn's first to second reign --- Paulley

NWA VA Jr. Heavyweight page has been cleaned up. Thanks JeffCapo 02:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need some assistance on the main NWA Virginia article. The promotion has changed its name to NWA Championship Wrestling from Virginia and the article needs to reflect that. Thanks as always! JeffCapo 01:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TJ Spyke

We've been having a "discussion" about how championship dates are listed, so whenever I make any changes to them, he's been considering it vandalism, despite the fact I'm going by official sources. vDub 12:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed there is a problem with this.... it needs to be put to a vote at the wikiproject to get a final decision on whever we use the promotions official dates or actual dates...--- Paulley

A few discussions going on

On the Pro Wrestling project talk page: there is three discussions going on. Piper's Pit: should it be an article or not? Listing champions on PPV pages (even though the title isn't on the line) and how stables should be listed on roster pages (under the section called: Roster issues). If you have the time, could you input on these? RobJ1981 23:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Elbow_drop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elbow_drop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RavenKneeAttack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RavenKneeAttack.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]