User talk:Paultnharris

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Other Tribe.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Other Tribe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Other Tribe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Other Tribe

Hello Paultnharris. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Other Tribe".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Other Tribe}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tinashe Fazakerley

I am reversing your move of the above musician's article. There's only one artist by this name, and he's currently using the stage name "Rationale". Here's a reliable source that confirms it: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/rationale-interview-ive-carved-my-own-path-and-its-feeling-good-a7124761.html. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, ±but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paultnharris. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your help, anonymous. I believe I have now supplied enough additional sources and improved the tone of the article to warrant removing the maintenance template from the page. If you still feel that this article does not meet Wikipedia's standards, perhaps you could help me further by telling me specifically what parts of the article do not adhere to the guidelines. You are obviously a very experienced wikipedia editor and I would appreciate your input on this matter. Thank you Paultnharris (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed all your concerns with this page now, anonymous. Please advise if you do not concur. Paultnharris (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a level two warning above, because you removed relevant maintenance templates again without actually addressing the problems. Notability has not been established, via multiple reliable sources that give more than passing mention to the subject. Instead, you've created an article that's about the people he works with and the music they've created. You've also pumped up a few of the source titles--by which I mean falsified them--to include the subject's name, when he was not mentioned in the actual headlines, nor featured prominently in the sources. Along with a related article(s) you've worked on, this has the look of a public relations effort for someone of dubious note, which is why I've also added WP:COI as a concern, which you've not addressed, either. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, an association with Willtalbot4 (talk · contribs) appears more than coincidental. If you're working together that needs to be explained as well. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who am I talking to here? Is there a third party who we can draw in to this conversation please? If you work for Wikipedia I would like to talk to your manager please. Your tone is getting fairly aggressive and accusatory, as I can assure you I have not falsified any articles (how would I go about doing that any way?). I did not intentionally 'pump up' the titles (though now I understand what you mean I will change them to reflect the actual titles of the article - that was my not being totally familiar with the way Wikipedia works, nothing more). I did supply what I thought was a valid reason for the removal of the template above, and asked you to tell me what more I can do to make you happy. Furthermore, there might only be what you consider to be 'passing mentions' - but Mark Crew genuinely did the work described therein, is written about on those secondary sources, and has had that success, so therefore he is a notable person in that respect. There are countless articles on Wikipedia about other music producers who have had far less success than Mark - so I do not know why you are singling him out for this unfair treatment. I will happily disclose that I work with Mark, but I have taken utmost care to keep this article neutral and to have it adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. Mark is a notable music producer, having produced a lot of successful albums (the producers job is to create music with acts - and obviously they are the ones who are written about more), so people are genuinely interested in reading about him. If you feel any word of my article does not adhere to guidelines, I will gladly edit. That you call him someone of 'dubious note' is insulting and aggressive.

Finally, I will be referring you to the arbitration committee, as I do feel that you are being inappropriate and are getting vexatious rather than collaborative, in direct conflict with the ideals of Wikipedia. Thank you Paultnharris (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I implore you to take this to arbitration, or any noticeboard for further input and/or administrative assistance, where WP:COI can be discussed further and with greater attention from other editors. But I strongly suggest reading our guidelines first, links to which have been provided above. That the subject 'did the work' is not in question. What hasn't been established is WP:NOTABILITY through WP:RELIABLE sources. In short, I could not find articles or substantial coverage about him. And please remember to note related article Braque (Music Producer) in your report, too. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on [[:2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63]]. Thank you. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 14:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, since this wasn't previously provided

Welcome!

Hello, Paultnharris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]