User talk:Peregrine981/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Peregrine981. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
European Commission
Does your work for the European Commission instruct your editing of sites related to European Politics? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.23.117 (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- I edit this site in a private capacity, but of course my life experience influences my editing. Does your profession influence your edits? We don't know because you don't even have the courtesy to sign your postings. Peregrine981 (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, understood, but please bear in mind that what passes for objectivity in the Commission is not the same as in the outside world - criticism can be healthy :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.23.114 (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hence my interest in Open Europe. The Commission is more open to criticism than you might think internally, but it is obviously heavily constrained in what it can do "in the real world" because of, well, politics. Anyway, now that that is on the table, I'm curious if you are affiliated with Open Europe or a related organisation? Peregrine981 (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- I know it and think it does some good work. It comes up with the sort of ideas the EU needs if it is to survive ~ or at least with the UK within it. In the UK they are the moderates, and if their reform agenda is shot down or blocked then the UK is left with a binary choice. So I think they do a useful job and have useful proposals the EU institutions should embrace or at least engage with ~ not just on wiki :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.23.96 (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hence my interest in Open Europe. The Commission is more open to criticism than you might think internally, but it is obviously heavily constrained in what it can do "in the real world" because of, well, politics. Anyway, now that that is on the table, I'm curious if you are affiliated with Open Europe or a related organisation? Peregrine981 (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, understood, but please bear in mind that what passes for objectivity in the Commission is not the same as in the outside world - criticism can be healthy :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.23.114 (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Open Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Rennie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Silent Generation
Hi, you've been helpful in the past, thanks. Could you take a look at this please http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bobrayner#Silent_Generation_Article I think it was a rash move and should be restored. 172.250.31.151 (talk) 23:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Billings Bridge Plaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- NN 460,000 sq ft mall.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 03:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 4 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Westgate Shopping Centre (Ottawa) page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File source problem with File:NACandparliament.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NACandparliament.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thanks for the continued careful and unbiased editing and improving on the work of other users in a collaborative and respectful fashion Pengortm (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC) |
Straw Poll
There is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.
The straw poll is at Template talk:Infobox person#Straw poll.
--Guy Macon (talk) 09:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
sabotaging autonomous car article
Hi, I don't appreciate you undoing my valuable work on the autonomous car page. I am one of the few editors knowledgeable about the topic (I studied robotics at university). The maps article did indeed say that it was difficult to update maps, but as I mentioned, creating maps is an inherent ability of a robotic car, not an external obstacle getting in the way. We could equivalently say that cars need to be made autonomous before they can drive autonomously. The article perhaps made it seem like someone else must create the maps instead of the car, but an autonomous car is, by definition, capable of updating the map, as mentioned earlier in the WP article you edited.
You provided no justification for reverting my rewording of the interactions with pedestrians. Governments decide what capabilities are required of robotic cars, not Wikipedia authors.
The discussion of "changes in road infrastructure" was fluff. These scenarios are not obstacles if they just prevent the robots operating optimally, it's only if they prevent the robots operating in a similar manner to existing cars. More importantly, neither the bullet-point itself or the article cited made a clear point, so it was not possible to reword it. The Washington Post author clearly had a limited understanding of the topic but went ahead and wrote the article anyway. If you'd like to re-include this article with some kind of meaningful, clear point, I won't stop you. For now, I'm forced to reinstate my work in the interests of the article. Owen214 (talk) 07:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Toronto streetcar system
Hi, Peregrine981. I noticed a change you made on Toronto streetcar system that added a claim that Europe was also eliminating streetcars after WW2 in favour of busses. The original statement that only included North America should be cited, but in all my years I've never heard of a similar thing happening in Europe.
Please feel free to re-add your edit, but if you do I would very much appreciate it if you add a citation supporting the Europe claim. And if you can find any citations for the North America claim as well, please feel free to add them to the article too! // coldacid (talk|contrib) 03:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I've added a citation as you requested. The article in question deals with different aspects of streetcar use in Europe, but has some clear charts about the closure of tram systems across Europe. In fact it doesn't even mention a number of them though. See trams in London, trams in Paris, trams in Istanbul, trams in Berlin (for West Berlin), trams in Hamburg, trams in Copenhagen for an overview of some of the closures. (though there were many more). However, a number of cities have since reinstated the systems, and others have openened new ones since the 80s, that is why it may seem as if Europe didn't close its systems. Anyway, thanks for the vigilance. I may try to find a source for north america as well. Peregrine981 (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, that works for me. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 12:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban sprawl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Per se. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Photo
Hi, Is this photo one of your photos? If so, how did it end up being uploaded by a SimonP and tagged as having been released to the public domain by that person? Your photos on Wikimedia seem usually to be under licenses, so I'm only trying to figure out what happened with this one and if the release is valid. Maybe you can clarify the situation in the description page on Commons? Thank you in advance for your help. -- Asclepias (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Asclepias, I am a friend of SimonP, so I probably sent him the picture. I can't remember the details of why he uploaded vs me, but I consent to the upload and agree for it to be released into the public domain. I'll leave a note on commons. Thanks for checking. Peregrine981 (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Peregrine981. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Peregrine981. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
"Star fort" v "Bastion fort" debate
You may be interested in Talk:Star_fort#Requested_move_19_January_2017. Alansplodge (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
http://www.nhlstreams.me/474198/5/stanley-cup-playoffs:-ottawa-senators-vs-boston-bruins-live-stream-online.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.29.255.185 (talk) 22:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Peregrine981. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Banal nationalism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability, the only reference is a primary source.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Please claim your upload(s): File:Lesplanade Laurier Corner.jpg
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,
However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.
If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
:_File:Lesplanade_Laurier_Corner.jpg){kind=link}
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Peregrine981. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
RfC which might interest you
Talk:Austria-Hungary#RfC: National flags vs Maritime Ensign --Havsjö (talk) 09:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)