User talk:Phooli

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Pingveno 10:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pingveno 10:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pingveno 10:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. 152.16.16.75 (talk) 10:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You have been blocked for repeated disruptive edits, im spite of multiple warnings above, all of which you seem to have ignored. Please note that you are welcome to contribute constructively after your block expires. (To learn more about how to edit Wikipedia, please see WP:WELCOME.)

However, if you still cannot edit constructively and continue to act disruptively, you will end up being blocked again, possibly indefinitely. -- The Anome (talk) 10:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Main Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Main Page was changed by Phooli (u) (t) deleting 15084 characters on 2010-03-15T06:45:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rankings Of NIT College In India

The article Rankings Of NIT College In India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Rankings Of NIT College In India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rankings Of NIT College In India. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – National Institutes of Technology. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at National Institutes of Technology – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wikishovel (talk) 07:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Religion in Ivory Coast, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]