User talk:Phuntsok2000

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Shree Ashtavinayak Cine Vision LTD., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.--21:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Shree Ashtavinayak Cine Vision LTD. Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shree Ashtavinayak Cine Vision LTD. Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Simpsons DanCastellaneta 300wide.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Simpsons DanCastellaneta 300wide.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:4Runner Volta.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:4Runner Volta.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:4Runner SW.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:4Runner SW.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Amelia Bedelia (1884 Movie)

A tag has been placed on Amelia Bedelia (1884 Movie) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 01:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Portblairflag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Portblairflag.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of WIKIPROPS

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travis ^talk 00:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Flagofhyderabad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flagofhyderabad.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dfcv Fgfg

A tag has been placed on Dfcv Fgfg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Dfcv Fgfg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion _(talk) 18:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Missing Polish zloty! (Keroro Gunso Episode)

A tag has been placed on Missing Polish zloty! (Keroro Gunso Episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Treygdor (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Microsoft-Compatibility-UI-screenshot.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Microsoft-Compatibility-UI-screenshot.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of AGFA Multimedia Edition

A tag has been placed on AGFA Multimedia Edition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- pb30<talk> 02:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Saturday, September 6

Re: PlayStation 3

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to PlayStation 3. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin actions

Hello there. It would be appreciated if you could leave administrative actions to administrators; for example, please don't remove protection templates from articles. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 22:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canada

Never remove non-vandalism from an article without giving a reason. Why are you removing the image from the territorial evolution article? --Golbez (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Timeline of country and capital changes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WhoBob WhatPants

I'm not sure what you were trying to do when you moved SpongeBob SquarePants (character) to Whobob Whatpants (character), but I have reverted it back to what it originally was. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as User:Phuntsok2000/Nickerlodeon, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – iride scent 00:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

December 2008

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phuntsok2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pagemove vandalism/somehow doing admin actions

Decline reason:

No reason for unblocking specified. However, I doubt that anyone reviewing the contributions of this account will be inclined to unblock anyway. —Travis ^talk 23:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2009

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phuntsok2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pagemove vandalism/somehow doing admin actions

Decline reason:

Page moves are not specifically an admin action, but, yes, you are blocked for page move vandalism. Your request, however, doesn't give me any reason to think that unblocking you would make the encyclopedia better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2009

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phuntsok2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pagemove vandalism/somehow doing admin actions

Decline reason:

Insanity is trying the same thing multiple times and expecting a different result each time. Declined; unblock is both nonsensical and fails to address the reasons for the block. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!)} 00:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2009

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phuntsok2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

welcome

Decline reason:

Thank you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phuntsok2000 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dylan 620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 13:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Microsoft Compatibility UI

The article Microsoft Compatibility UI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article with little context, maybe hoax because it has been created and edit mainly by vandal sockpuppets. Also the long version list and details in the infobox seem dubious (CC-BY-SA software from Microsoft?)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpaceFlight89 17:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phuntsok2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

plz my melody

Decline reason:

No. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.