User talk:Pintere

August 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Karl Roßmann, from its old location at User:Pintere/sandbox/Karl Roßmann. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 23:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Pintere, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pintere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

New article content

In the articles you have created, it says, for example, "Konrad Steets' new article content ..." in the lead. I assume this was a mistake, but just wanted to notify you so you can stop including it. Thanks ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Thilo Freiherr von Werthern, from its old location at User:Pintere/sandbox/Thilo Freiherr von Werthern. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 03:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Fritz Beigel, from its old location at User:Pintere/sandbox/Fritz Beigel. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 03:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Arthur Becker, from its old location at User:Pintere/sandbox/Arthur Becker. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 03:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

New articles on Knight's Cross winners

Hi, I've noticed that you created a number of articles on the Knight's Cross winners. I wanted to let you know that, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: Redirect proposal for RK winners, the awarding of the Knight's Cross was deemed not to confer presumed notability on the recipients.

Following the above discussion, the notability essay for the Military History project has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients have been redirected to alphabetical lists. Please have a look at WP:SOLDIER which suggests some of the factors that may make a military figure to be presumed notable, such as having a general's rank and having commanded a significant body of troops in battle (usually a division for land forces). Please let me know if you have any questions about that discussion.

Separately, many of the new articles include a link to http://en.ww2awards.com/. I am wondering if you are affiliated with this web site in any way. If you could let me know, that would be great. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Should I take this to mean that it is unacceptable for me to continue to create articles for individuals on the sole basis of their receipt of the Knight's Cross? If so I was not aware that I could only create Wikipedia articles if a person was noteworthy enough.

As for the ww2awards page I have no affiliation with the site. It is merely the only site I know in English of where details such as date of birth/death, rank, etc. for the vast majority of Knight's Cross recipients can be corroborated.

Thank you. Yes, if the subjects' only claims to notability are their receipt of the Knight's Cross, then articles on them should not be created. Please see Wikipedia:Notability: "Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article." K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

OK. Fair enough. I can get that such articles shouldn't be created, but is there any problem with me doing so? After all, everyone I'm covering is already linked to in the lists of Knight's Cross recipients. I have acquired a lot of biographical information on Knight's Cross recipients and I have created this Wikipedia account for the sole purpose of making this info available to a wide audience. If I can still go ahead with creating pages for Knight's Cross recipients with biographical info I will do so. Are you telling me that the pages I create from now on will be deleted?

In other words, I want to keep creating articles even if it's not recommended. However if my work will be undone either by deletion or something similar, please let me know ASAP so I don't waste my time publishing my findings at a place they are not welcome.

Yes, it's likely that these articles would be deleted or redirected to the lists. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

So be it. That is unfortunate, but if that is the case then there is no point in continuing to contribute to the site.

Proposed deletion of Rupert Kraus

The article Rupert Kraus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

AFIK the Knights Cross doesn't make the threshold for WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wolfgang Hartelt

The article Wolfgang Hartelt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

AFIK the Knights Cross doesn't make the threshold for WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Werner Stuchlick

The article Werner Stuchlick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

AFIK the Knights Cross doesn't make the threshold for WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Becker (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arthur Becker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Beigel (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aguyintobooks was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Beigel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) -  15:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Wikia Military

Greetings Pintere, I see you submitted quite a few articles here that were deleted or redirected due to Wikipedia's rules on notability. I would like to invite you to submit those over to the military wiki on Wikia here instead. A few were already imported by one of the editors there. That wiki doesn't have the same notability criteria as Wikipedia and articles such as this are welcomed and encouraged there. PS, the site is best viewed in the Monobook skin, which is more like the layout Wikipedia uses. If you like the Wikia skin though you are free to use that as well. Cheers! 138.162.0.42 (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thilo Freiherr von Werthern (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thilo Freiherr von Werthern and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Arthur Becker concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arthur Becker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Fritz Beigel concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fritz Beigel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Thilo Freiherr von Werthern concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thilo Freiherr von Werthern, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Becker

Hello, Pintere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Becker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:34, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fritz Beigel

Hello, Pintere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fritz Beigel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thilo Freiherr von Werthern

Hello, Pintere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thilo Freiherr von Werthern".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)