User talk:Pivotman319/Archive 3

t r o u t

Whack!

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gilliam: I never thought it would happen to me until now after a year of edit reverting. Thank you! (and I'll also thank you for your service to the Wiki <3) - pivotman319 (📫) 17:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Path slopu: Thank you!

revert on Nikolai Kuznetsov (spy)

Hi, I rolledback your revert of an IP edit on the page Nikolai Kuznetsov (spy), the edit summary contained the reason why (incorrect Nikolai Kuznetsov) ... which is correct, because the citation belongs here Nikolai Kuznetsov (admiral).--Goldsztajn (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldsztajn: Apologies for the revert. I had a hefty workload to take care of.

@Pivotman319: no problems, just didn't want you thinking I was stepping on your toes...well maybe just one. :) --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

revert on Myth III: The Wolf Age

Hello Pivotman319, I submitted an IP edit on the page Myth III: The Wolf Age without edit summary, the reason being that the page was wrongfully referring to Rebecca Heineman by her deadname, since she's transitioned. You reverted my edit "because they did not appear constructive". Could you please explain why my edit would be unconstructive, considering it's correcting the name of a developer who's mentioned multiple times on the page by the wrong name? SummerB76 (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SummerB76: Sincerest apologies for the unintentional revert; I had initially thought that the name change was potential vandalism (mistakes happen) and hence had reverted it. Thank you for the clarification, however!

@Pivotman319: Thank you for the apologies, I've reapplied the edit on that article with the correct name. SummerB76 (talk) 16:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC) (Wasn't logged in while making this edit.)[reply]

accusations of defamatory comments

Defamation (sometimes known as calumny, vilification, or traducement) is the oral or written communication of a false statement about another that unjustly harms their reputation. You accused me of this after I wrote "Even thou there has been no evidence found to date against president trump, the democrats continue to harass the president with more investigations and shifting over from Russia to the Ukraine. That's fact, no defamatory or vandalism. Then your threatening to Block me from participating because your not in agreement with the facts. Very Unfair sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.172.161 (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@75.167.172.161: see dispute comment

FYI

Just thought I'd respond to you here in regards to this. I wasn't disputing your reversals... I just couldn't speak to those reversals (because I didn't make them). I do agree with them though, and if you hadn't reverted those IP's edits, I would have. :) Good work, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MelbourneStar: Thanks for the message. I already knew about this fact, however. I also had agreed with your points as well so I thought I would respond about this situation there. - pivotman319 (📫) 04:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reasn for changes

Hi, I am trying to define the establishment in the main introduction, it has a strong link to the british definition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignatius529 (talk • contribs) 10:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ignatius529: Your edit appeared to be removing information that was vital to the article (and were also sourced). - pivotman319 (📫) 19:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Stop code" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stop code. Since you had some involvement with the Stop code redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 11:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

/* Business */ @Sachin_Joshi

Hi, I've removed references of case filed against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachiin_J._Joshi which is no way the actual story and the page was updated on the basis of media speculations. As it is clear from prime fascia proof that both these people have been accusing each other and said case mention under the business subhead of wikipedia page of Sachin Joshi is under jurisdiction, so putting up these rumours on wikipedia page will adversely affect the person reputation until proven guilty by law of court and as per indian law putting false and unverified ( media coverage for criminal charges unless proven in court of law are not verified informations) information online leads to prosecution under the law.

https://www.indulgexpress.com/entertainment/celebs/2020/mar/05/nri-sachiin-j-joshi-accuses-shilpa-shetty-and-hubby-raj-kundra-of-cheating-in-gold-scam-22847.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.212.144.96 (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]